Re: Interesting observations wrt FDO and tramp3d-v4

2005-12-10 Thread Jan Hubicka
> > I have added FDO runs to the daily tramp3d tester and am observing > "intersting" things there. First of all, compile time with > -fprofile-generate (w/o leafify) skyrocketed from ~120s to 440s. > For reference, here's the hot spots in -ftime-report: > > life analysis : 24.66 ( 6%)

Re: Interesting observations wrt FDO and tramp3d-v4

2005-12-08 Thread Richard Guenther
On 12/8/05, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have added FDO runs to the daily tramp3d tester and am observing > "intersting" things there. Btw. I finally was able to move it to public webspace. You can have a look at http://www.suse.de/~rguenther/ Richard.

Re: Interesting observations wrt FDO and tramp3d-v4

2005-12-08 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Thursday 08 December 2005 13:11, Richard Guenther wrote: > look at those CSE numbers! Why do they surprise you? > The profile generating numbers suggest we're either doing something > stupid, or that we want some heuristics applied to not instrument > every edge, but only interesting ones. We

Interesting observations wrt FDO and tramp3d-v4

2005-12-08 Thread Richard Guenther
I have added FDO runs to the daily tramp3d tester and am observing "intersting" things there. First of all, compile time with -fprofile-generate (w/o leafify) skyrocketed from ~120s to 440s. For reference, here's the hot spots in -ftime-report: life analysis : 24.66 ( 6%) usr 0.00 (