Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 20/09/2007, Doug Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We can't seem to decide whether ISO C++ really forbids comparisons
>> between pointers and integers or not. The first two are for == and !=,
>> the second two are for <, >, <=, >=. Why the inconsistency?
>>
>> typ
On 20/09/2007, Doug Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We can't seem to decide whether ISO C++ really forbids comparisons
> between pointers and integers or not. The first two are for == and !=,
> the second two are for <, >, <=, >=. Why the inconsistency?
>
> typeck.c: error ("ISO C++ f
We can't seem to decide whether ISO C++ really forbids comparisons
between pointers and integers or not. The first two are for == and !=,
the second two are for <, >, <=, >=. Why the inconsistency?
typeck.c: error ("ISO C++ forbids comparison between pointer
and integer");
typeck.c:
