Re: Implicit type conversion check

On 30/11/06, Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Pierre Chatelier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there any plan to enforce warnings about implicit type conversion ? See . Andreas. Just to clarify things. That is the 'development page' that is, where

Re: Implicit type conversion check

On 30/11/06, Pierre Chatelier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I am sorry if it is some usual request, but I could not find recent information about that, neither in the mailing list nor in the FAQ. Is there any plan to enforce warnings about implicit type conversion ? I am happy to inform y

Re: Implicit type conversion check

Pierre Chatelier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there any plan to enforce warnings about implicit type conversion ? See . Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fin

Re: Implicit type conversion check

On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 11:47 +0100, Pierre Chatelier wrote: > Hello, > > I am sorry if it is some usual request, but I could not find recent > information about that, neither in the mailing list nor in the FAQ. Yes it is in the mailing list. In fact this is just being worked on in the last coupl

Implicit type conversion check

Hello, I am sorry if it is some usual request, but I could not find recent information about that, neither in the mailing list nor in the FAQ. Is there any plan to enforce warnings about implicit type conversion ? the -W option implies some checks about _comparison_ between signed and unsig