> > > It is on the wish list, but I'm afraid I won't have cycles for it in the
> > > next year or two at least (once GCC 9 is released, I need to work on the
> > > remaining OpenMP 5.0 features). Of course if somebody implements it and
> > > submits
> > > and it is of reasonable quality/performan
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 10:05:25PM +0900, 김규래 wrote:
> > It is on the wish list, but I'm afraid I won't have cycles for it in the
> > next year or two at least (once GCC 9 is released, I need to work on the
> > remaining OpenMP 5.0 features). Of course if somebody implements it and
> > submits
>
ects we are discussing (Additional scheduling
algorithms, doing something about auto, WS etc..)
could make the cut for a GSoC 2019 project?
Ray Kim
-Original Message-
From: "Jakub Jelinek"
To: "김규래";
Cc: "gcc Mailing List";
Sent: 2019-03-02 (토) 02:46:14 (GM
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 02:40:35AM +0900, 김규래 wrote:
> Nice to meet you Jacob.
>
> > Another option is to add further schedules as extensions (say starting with
> > gnu_ prefix or similar).
>
> In this case, I believe that modifying the frontend would be necessary?
Yes.
> Last time I looked,
-02 (토) 02:32:29 (GMT+09:00)
Subject: Re: Implementing an algorithm in place of gomp 'auto'
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 11:40:50PM +0900, 김규래 wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I'm an EE student at Sogang University Korea.
> I have recently submitted a paper on parallel loop scheduling
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 11:40:50PM +0900, 김규래 wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I'm an EE student at Sogang University Korea.
> I have recently submitted a paper on parallel loop scheduling algorithm and
> had to modify libgomp a bit in the process.
> It is known that the...
>
>
>
> /* For now map
Hello everyone,
I'm an EE student at Sogang University Korea.
I have recently submitted a paper on parallel loop scheduling algorithm and had
to modify libgomp a bit in the process.
It is known that the...
/* For now map to schedule(static), later on we could play with feedback driven
choic
