Re: Definitely not IRA [was Re: Probably not IRA [was Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]]]

2009-01-25 Thread Dave Korn
Dave Korn wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: > >[ ... snip ... ] > > Sorry, the conclusion of that post evolved a bit while I was writing it, > but I forgot to update the subject. This is what I should have posted it as. > I'll start a fresh thread when I know more about the cause of the failure.

Definitely not IRA [was Re: Probably not IRA [was Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]]]

2009-01-23 Thread Dave Korn
Dave Korn wrote: [ ... snip ... ] Sorry, the conclusion of that post evolved a bit while I was writing it, but I forgot to update the subject. This is what I should have posted it as. I'll start a fresh thread when I know more about the cause of the failure. cheers, DaveK

Probably not IRA [was Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]]

2009-01-23 Thread Dave Korn
Dave Korn wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: >> H.J. Lu wrote: >>> An IRA setjmp bug was fixed recently: >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38587 >>> >>> Does it fix your problem? >> I'm not sure, but my source tree is at r.143552, which is just a couple >> of revs before your fix went in.

Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]

2009-01-23 Thread Dave Korn
Dave Korn wrote: > H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Dave Korn wrote: >>>Hi all, >>> >>> re: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38952 >>> [Regression/4.4,P1 blocker IMHO: total failure of SjLj EH on Cygwin+MinGW] >>> >>> I have a simple testcase showing breakage in Sj

Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]

2009-01-23 Thread Dave Korn
H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Dave Korn wrote: >>Hi all, >> >> re: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38952 >> [Regression/4.4,P1 blocker IMHO: total failure of SjLj EH on Cygwin+MinGW] >> >> I have a simple testcase showing breakage in SjLj EH on Cygwin. To cut >

Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]

2009-01-23 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Dave Korn wrote: >Hi all, > > re: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38952 > [Regression/4.4,P1 blocker IMHO: total failure of SjLj EH on Cygwin+MinGW] > > I have a simple testcase showing breakage in SjLj EH on Cygwin. To cut > right to the chase, t

IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]

2009-01-23 Thread Dave Korn
Hi all, re: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38952 [Regression/4.4,P1 blocker IMHO: total failure of SjLj EH on Cygwin+MinGW] I have a simple testcase showing breakage in SjLj EH on Cygwin. To cut right to the chase, the RTL generated by the 130r.eh pass to save %ebp (the frame