Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/30/09 14:48, Michael Eager wrote:
Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/30/09 14:17, Michael Eager wrote:
I've run into a situation where assign_hard_reg()
decides that there are no registers available.
That can certainly happen. It's also the case that assign_hard_reg
may decide that
Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/30/09 14:48, Michael Eager wrote:
Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/30/09 14:17, Michael Eager wrote:
I've run into a situation where assign_hard_reg()
decides that there are no registers available.
That can certainly happen. It's also the case that assign_hard_reg
may decide that
On 11/30/09 14:48, Michael Eager wrote:
Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/30/09 14:17, Michael Eager wrote:
I've run into a situation where assign_hard_reg()
decides that there are no registers available.
That can certainly happen. It's also the case that assign_hard_reg
may decide that memory is cheaper
Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/30/09 14:17, Michael Eager wrote:
I've run into a situation where assign_hard_reg()
decides that there are no registers available.
That can certainly happen. It's also the case that assign_hard_reg may
decide that memory is cheaper than a register and refuse to assign a
On 11/30/09 14:17, Michael Eager wrote:
I've run into a situation where assign_hard_reg()
decides that there are no registers available.
That can certainly happen. It's also the case that assign_hard_reg may
decide that memory is cheaper than a register and refuse to assign a
register for cert
I've run into a situation where assign_hard_reg()
decides that there are no registers available. This
results in a memory reference being substituted for a
pseudo-register. There's no check to see if the modified
instruction is valid, which it isn't.
There are a lot of live registers and it is
