Vladimir Makarov wrote:
Hi, Richard. Returning to accurate cost accumulation issue you found
recently. Here is the patch fixing it. You could try, if you want,
how MIPS will behave with it. The patch also more accurately
calculates ALLOCNO_CALL_FREQ which affects decision to spill allocno
"H.J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Even so, I'm now fairly confident that we should put GR_REGS and ACC_REGS
>> in the same cover class, which was the main area of doubt. I'll therefore
>> commit the MIPS port in a sec. Is it OK if I commit it to ira-merge
>> as well?
>>
>
> Please commit i
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Richard Sandiford
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even so, I'm now fairly confident that we should put GR_REGS and ACC_REGS
> in the same cover class, which was the main area of doubt. I'll therefore
> commit the MIPS port in a sec. Is it OK if I commit it to ira-me
Hi Vlad,
Sorry for the slow reply.
Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, Richard. Returning to accurate cost accumulation issue you found
> recently. Here is the patch fixing it. You could try, if you want, how
> MIPS will behave with it. The patch also more accurately calcula
Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, Richard. Returning to accurate cost accumulation issue you found
> recently. Here is the patch fixing it. You could try, if you want, how
> MIPS will behave with it. The patch also more accurately calculates
> ALLOCNO_CALL_FREQ which affect
Hi Vlad,
Thanks for the great reply, and sorry for not replying sooner.
Things have been a bit hectic for me recently.
Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Although I suspect it isn't intentional, I can imagine it doesn't show
>> up much on targets whose memo
Hi, Richard. Returning to accurate cost accumulation issue you found
recently. Here is the patch fixing it. You could try, if you want, how
MIPS will behave with it. The patch also more accurately calculates
ALLOCNO_CALL_FREQ which affects decision to spill allocno in
assign_hard_reg if it
Richard Sandiford wrote:
If PARENT_A is a parent of allocno A, propagate_allocno_info does
the equivalent of:
ALLOCNO_HARD_REG_COSTS(parent_a)[i] += ALLOCNO_HARD_REG_COSTS(a)[i]
which is what you'd expect from the comments. But after that,
should each update ALLOCNO_HARD_REG_COSTS(a)[i] be
I've a question about the way IRA accumulates information from
nested regions into parent regions. ira-int.h says:
/* Accumulated usage references of the allocno. Here and below,
word 'accumulated' means info for given region and all nested
subregions. In this case, 'accumulated' me
