"Mohamed Shafi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You can look into config/i386.md, how i.e. adddi3 is expanded and split in
>> case of !TARGET_64BIT.
>
> But is it scheduling safe?
> I mean you can't have addc executed before add. If i am right there
> will be no dependency between the two instructi
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Mohamed Shafi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The 16bit target that i am porting to gcc4.1.2 doesn't have any
>>> instructions for 32bit operations. But for addition and subtraction
>>> there is
>>> addc
>>> subc
>>> instructions that consider carry bit also. Presen
2008/6/7 Uros Bizjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello!
>
>> The 16bit target that i am porting to gcc4.1.2 doesn't have any
>> instructions for 32bit operations. But for addition and subtraction
>> there is
>> addc
>> subc
>> instructions that consider carry bit also. Presently i have patterns
>> for S
Hello!
The 16bit target that i am porting to gcc4.1.2 doesn't have any
instructions for 32bit operations. But for addition and subtraction
there is
addc
subc
instructions that consider carry bit also. Presently i have patterns
for SImode addition and subtraction such that the template will have
Hello all,
The 16bit target that i am porting to gcc4.1.2 doesn't have any
instructions for 32bit operations. But for addition and subtraction
there is
addc
subc
instructions that consider carry bit also. Presently i have patterns
for SImode addition and subtraction such that the template will hav
