On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Richard Guenther
> > wrote:
> >> Does FreeBSD ever set errno for malloc() calls? See PR47179 and
> >> PR42944 - which means it might require splitting the flag
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> Does FreeBSD ever set errno for malloc() calls? See PR47179 and
>> PR42944 - which means it might require splitting the flag into a
>> math piece and a general piece (or one coveri
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> Does FreeBSD ever set errno for malloc() calls? See PR47179 and
> PR42944 - which means it might require splitting the flag into a
> math piece and a general piece (or one covering just malloc & friends).
The option's documentation (and t
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> David Schultz noticed that the FreeBSD libm does not set errno, never
> has done, and never will, and thus has made -fno-math-errno the default
> in the (old, GCC 4.2-based) system compiler:
>
> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revisi
David Schultz noticed that the FreeBSD libm does not set errno, never
has done, and never will, and thus has made -fno-math-errno the default
in the (old, GCC 4.2-based) system compiler:
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=181538
We should also make this change for GCC 4.