Re: Help with fixinclude fix for PR86599

2018-08-15 Thread David Edelsohn
The change should not unintentionally affect existing tests. The new test should be exactly the text that "make check" produces, not what you think it should look like and not like another, neighboring test. If the test doesn't look as you expect, you need to examine your test text. You also can

Re: Help with fixinclude fix for PR86599

2018-08-15 Thread Albert Chin
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 03:52:33PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > You must manually insert the additional test lines into the appropriate > file in fixincludes/tests/base and then retest. > > Please see step (6) in fixincludes/README Ok, thanks. fixincludes/tests/res/stdlib.h has: #if defined(

Re: Help with fixinclude fix for PR86599

2018-08-15 Thread David Edelsohn
You must manually insert the additional test lines into the appropriate file in fixincludes/tests/base and then retest. Please see step (6) in fixincludes/README Thanks, David On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:46 PM Albert Chin wrote: > Hi. I've come up with a fixincl fix for PR86599 but "make chec

Help with fixinclude fix for PR86599

2018-08-15 Thread Albert Chin
Hi. I've come up with a fixincl fix for PR86599 but "make check" in the fixincludes directory does not work and I do not know why. I know just enough fixincl-fu to produce a patch for this issue. I am trying to convert a chunk of code in stdlib on HP-UX 11.31/PA: # ifndef _LONG_DOUBLE #define