This is kind of stream-of-conciousness but I swear there's an
interesting new bit about 8 paragraphs down. :)
On 04/20/2016 07:18 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Zan Lynx wrote:
>> > I would like someone to look at this and tell me this is an already
>> > fixed bug. Or
This is the wrong mailing list for such questions, the gcc-help list
would be appropriate.
On 21 April 2016 at 02:11, Zan Lynx wrote:
> I would like someone to look at this and tell me this is an already
> fixed bug. Or that recent GCC patches may have fixed it. :-)
>
> Or it would also be great
On 4/20/2016 7:18 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Zan Lynx wrote:
I would like someone to look at this and tell me this is an already
fixed bug. Or that recent GCC patches may have fixed it. :-)
Or it would also be great to get some advice on building a reproducer
wit
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Zan Lynx wrote:
> I would like someone to look at this and tell me this is an already
> fixed bug. Or that recent GCC patches may have fixed it. :-)
>
> Or it would also be great to get some advice on building a reproducer
> without needing to include many megabyte
I would like someone to look at this and tell me this is an already
fixed bug. Or that recent GCC patches may have fixed it. :-)
Or it would also be great to get some advice on building a reproducer
without needing to include many megabytes of proprietary code plus Boost.
I've been using Fedora 2
On 09/15/2015 03:38 PM, Aditya K wrote:
> I started with one of the test cases in the plugin testsuite "def_plugin.c".
> Pasted the code for convenience.
> I want to traverse all the loops in a function.
>
> Maybe use, loops_for_fn (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (fndef)), but this does not
> seem to work
I started with one of the test cases in the plugin testsuite "def_plugin.c".
Pasted the code for convenience.
I want to traverse all the loops in a function.
Maybe use, loops_for_fn (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (fndef)), but this does not seem
to work.
/* Callback function to invoke after GCC finishe
"Balaji V. Iyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thank you Ian. I did the modification you mentioned...now I am running
> into more problems.
Again: gcc@gcc.gnu.org is the wrong mailing list. Please do not send
any more e-mail about this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please take any
followups to [EMAIL PR
y help is highly appreciated!
Yours Sincerely,
Balaji V. Iyer.
--
Balaji V. Iyer
PhD Student,
Center for Efficient, Scalable and Reliable Computing,
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
North Carolina State University.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:[EM
"Balaji V. Iyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to do some development on the C Compiler in Cygwin and I
> am doing the following to build it:
gcc@gcc.gnu.org is the wrong mailing list. Please send any further
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks.
> $ ../gcc-4.0.2/gcc/configure
R
Hello Everyone,
I am trying to do some development on the C Compiler in Cygwin and I
am doing the following to build it:
$ ../gcc-4.0.2/gcc/configure
--prefix=/home/Balaji/Software_Tools/install --enable-languages="c"
The problem i am getting is this:
$ make all install
TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT
On 11 February 2008 16:53, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Is there someone out there who can walk me through
> the steps necessary to run them cross on a simulator?
> I will need to test an installed toolset and
> will have to be able to specify:
>
> + an extra object file to link with.
> + target CFLAGS
Hi,
I can now run the ACATS reasonably automatically
and test powerpc, sparc, and i386 RTEMS targets.
I would like to keep my momentum going and get
some results on the non-Ada tests.
Is there someone out there who can walk me through
the steps necessary to run them cross on a simulator?
I will
Hello Everyone,
I have a question regarding GCC RTL. I am currently modifying the
OpenRISC backend to partition the register files. Here is an example of
my add function:
(define_insn "addsi3"
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=a,b,a,b")
(plus:SI (match_operand:
Balaji Viswanathan Iyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to understand GCC further, and I would like to know how
> GCC calls the parser from the main function in gcc.c.
The gcc driver execs another program, which for C is called cc1. The
main function in cc1 winds up calling the pa
Hello Everyone,
I am trying to understand GCC further, and I would like to know how
GCC calls the parser from the main function in gcc.c. I looked at the
YACC/BISON file and found that c_parse_file called yyparse(). Can
anyone please tell me which function calls c_parse_file and how I can
get
Balaji V. Iyer wrote:
> Pass this "live/not-live" flag to the register allocation process so that
> it can output instruction in such a way (please see example below) (I want
> this information to be passed into .md stage)
You can't get cycle-accurate life time info in the register allocator
unles
Hello Everyone,
Greetings! I apologize ahead for asking an non-specific question. I
have a question about the liveness analysis. This is what I wanted to
do.
I want to check to see if an instruction is live after a certain number of
stage. (eg. 3 cycles)
if (INSN is not live for more than 3 c
18 matches
Mail list logo
