On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 15:03 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Sorry for the long mail and for what's probably an FAQ. I did try to find
> an answer without bothering the list... (and showing my ignorance so much :-))
>
> At the moment, the s390 backend treats all atomic loads as simple loads
> an
Sorry for the long mail and for what's probably an FAQ. I did try to find
an answer without bothering the list... (and showing my ignorance so much :-))
At the moment, the s390 backend treats all atomic loads as simple loads
and only uses serialisation instructions for atomic stores. I just want
