On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Jerry Quinn wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 14:43 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> BIND_EXPRs are containers for local variables in the GENERIC
>> function body (they persist until GIMPLE is lowered). BLOCKs
>> represent the scope tree of the function (which also r
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 14:43 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> BIND_EXPRs are containers for local variables in the GENERIC
> function body (they persist until GIMPLE is lowered). BLOCKs
> represent the scope tree of the function (which also refers to
> local variables). The BLOCK tree is kept live
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Jerry Quinn wrote:
> (trying again)
> Hi, all. I have a basic question about GENERIC trees.
>
> I'm playing with writing a front end, and find the distinction between
> BLOCK and BIND_EXPR to be somewhat confusing. In particular, I'm trying
> to get a handle on ho
(trying again)
Hi, all. I have a basic question about GENERIC trees.
I'm playing with writing a front end, and find the distinction between
BLOCK and BIND_EXPR to be somewhat confusing. In particular, I'm trying
to get a handle on how to represent a function in GENERIC form.
On the surface the
Hi, all. I have a basic question about GENERIC trees.
I'm playing with writing a front end, and find the distinction between
BLOCK and BIND_EXPR to be somewhat confusing. In particular, I'm trying
to get a handle on how to represent a function in GENERIC form.
On the surface the texi docs and c
