Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions

2005-10-18 Thread Paul Thomas
Jakub, Well, certainly the graphs on Diego's page returned ~ up to normal values when you committed the fix. I agree - it IS fixed. Thanks Paul

Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions

2005-10-18 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 01:47:33AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Paul Thomas wrote: > > Have you made any progress on fixing this? I would rather that the > > debug information is not available than that equivalence is broken. > > My mind is going.

Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions

2005-10-18 Thread Richard Henderson
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Paul Thomas wrote: > Have you made any progress on fixing this? I would rather that the > debug information is not available than that equivalence is broken. My mind is going. After checking 4 or 5 different trees wondering where the patch is, I noticed

Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions

2005-10-17 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:08:59PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Paul Thomas wrote: > > Have you made any progress on fixing this? I would rather that the > > debug information is not available than that equivalence is broken. > > I've been working o

Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions

2005-10-17 Thread Richard Henderson
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Paul Thomas wrote: > Have you made any progress on fixing this? I would rather that the > debug information is not available than that equivalence is broken. I've been working on it. Is there a PR? r~

Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions

2005-10-17 Thread Paul Thomas
Jakub, Have you made any progress on fixing this? I would rather that the debug information is not available than that equivalence is broken. Best regards Paul

Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions

2005-10-17 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:21:05AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Since October 13, SPEC's swim, applu, and sixtrack fail to build and > fma3d has a serious performance degradation. See the results from > Diego's SPEC tester: > > http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000.i686/gcc/individual-run

Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions

2005-10-17 Thread Steven Bosscher
Hi,   Since October 13, SPEC's swim, applu, and sixtrack fail to build and fma3d has a serious performance degradation. See the results from Diego's SPEC tester: http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000.i686/gcc/individual-run-ratio.html   Gr. Steven