On 04/07/14 02:06, Matthew Fortune wrote:
It's not clear who would be best to talk to about this. I've added Jeff
as he appears to be listed against some mostly relevant areas in the
maintainers file. If you could point me towards anyone more suitable
that would be good.
While I've touched a lot
Actually add Jeff this time...
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Fortune
> Sent: 07 April 2014 09:07
> To: 'Richard Sandiford'
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED and regs_invalidated_by_call
>
> Richard Sandiford w
Richard Sandiford writes:
> Matthew Fortune writes:
> > Richard Sandiford writes:
> >> Matthew Fortune writes:
> >> Maybe some RA heuristics will need tweaking to reflect the extra
> cost
> >> of these registers, but I imagine that's true either way.
> >
> > Perhaps. I am currently thinking/hop
Matthew Fortune writes:
> Richard Sandiford writes:
>> Matthew Fortune writes:
>> > Hi Richard,
>> >
>> > As part of implementing the new O32 FPXX ABI I am making use of the
>> > HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED macro to allow odd-numbered
>> > floating-point registers to be considered as 'normall
Richard Sandiford writes:
> Matthew Fortune writes:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > As part of implementing the new O32 FPXX ABI I am making use of the
> > HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED macro to allow odd-numbered
> > floating-point registers to be considered as 'normally' callee-saved
> > but call clob
Matthew Fortune writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
> As part of implementing the new O32 FPXX ABI I am making use of the
> HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED macro to allow odd-numbered
> floating-point registers to be considered as 'normally' callee-saved
> but call clobbered if they are being used to hold SImo
Hi Richard,
As part of implementing the new O32 FPXX ABI I am making use of the
HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED macro to allow odd-numbered floating-point
registers to be considered as 'normally' callee-saved but call clobbered if
they
are being used to hold SImode or SFmode data. The macro is i
