Re: GSoC proposal for extending static analyzer

On Fri, 2022-04-15 at 22:36 +0530, Mir Immad wrote: > I've updated the link on the repo -- > https://mirimmad.github.io/zeta-lang. > > > You don't give many specifics in your personal decription.  One thing > > I'm not seeing is a sense of how proficient you are in various > > programming langua

Re: GSoC proposal for extending static analyzer

I've updated the link on the repo -- https://mirimmad.github.io/zeta-lang. > You don't give many specifics in your personal decription. One thing > I'm not seeing is a sense of how proficient you are in various > programming languages. In particular, how is your C and C++? How > familiar are yo

Re: GSoC proposal for extending static analyzer

On Fri, 2022-04-15 at 19:58 +0530, Mir Immad wrote: > I've submitted a proposal for extending the static analyzer to support > posix fd APIs on GSoC website. Here is the Google docs link (gdocs > < > https://docs.google.com/document/d/188zxPUsuYcF-uGVYL_G1s2RVtHhJSZeQ4sha40H7374/edit?usp=sharing >

GSoC proposal for extending static analyzer

I've submitted a proposal for extending the static analyzer to support posix fd APIs on GSoC website. Here is the Google docs link (gdocs ). Please take a look and let me know what you think. Thank