Thanks. I will use plain text.
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:32 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 10:24, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > I tried to send you Aligned patch and one csmith program but it bounces
> > back. I don't know why it happened. Sorry for sending mail 5 times. Sure,
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 10:24, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> I tried to send you Aligned patch and one csmith program but it bounces
> back. I don't know why it happened. Sorry for sending mail 5 times. Sure, I
> will reply to single thread.
If you're trying to send email to the GCC lists you need to u
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:23 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> On 5/15/19 9:49 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > void func_1();
> > void func_3();
> > .
> >
> > void foo1() __attribute__ ((weak, alias("func_1")));
> > void foo3() __attribute__ ((weak, alias("func_3")));
>
> Hi.
>
> In all emails that yo
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:13 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> On 5/15/19 9:49 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > Hello Martin and community,
>
> Hi Shubham.
>
> Thank you for starting working on the project. There are some
> recommendations
> before we fully being:
>
> 1) I've recently received 5 emails tha
On 5/15/19 9:49 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> void func_1();
> void func_3();
> .
>
> void foo1() __attribute__ ((weak, alias("func_1")));
> void foo3() __attribute__ ((weak, alias("func_3")));
Hi.
In all emails that you sent there's no patch that will implement 'alias'
attribute.
Thanks,
On 5/15/19 10:12 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> Hello Martin and community,
>
> Below is attached patch for Function Attribute Aligned -
>
> The command line option to generate aligned attribute is -
> --func-attr-aligned which can be found in ./csmith --help
>
> Please review the patch and sugge
On 5/15/19 9:49 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> Hello Martin and community,
Hi Shubham.
Thank you for starting working on the project. There are some recommendations
before we fully being:
1) I've recently received 5 emails that have very similar subject and it's
unclear why that happened? When
el free to raise any question you might have on an appropriate
mailing list[3] or say hi to us on the gcc development IRC channel [4].
If you have any concerns or questions regarding the organizational part
of GSoC 2019, feel free to contact me throughout the duration of the
program.
Once more, congratul
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 5:37 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> On 4/4/19 1:44 PM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:13 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/3/19 6:31 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> >>> Hello Shubham,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 29 2019, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> Hi, here is
On 4/4/19 1:44 PM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:13 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> On 4/3/19 6:31 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>> Hello Shubham,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 29 2019, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
Hi, here is my proposal for the above idea. Please review and suggest
nece
On 4/4/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 03 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> On 4/3/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>> Hello Joshi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
HI,
Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
review and suggest
>>>
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:13 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> On 4/3/19 6:31 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > Hello Shubham,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 29 2019, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> >> Hi, here is my proposal for the above idea. Please review and suggest
> >> necessary changes.
> >>
> >>
> https://docs.google.c
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:01 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hello Shubham,
>
> On Fri, Mar 29 2019, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > Hi, here is my proposal for the above idea. Please review and suggest
> > necessary changes.
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/11MNhuuD7dbwAfSW6ZgFrAys9My1Lw1PuMVc
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
> On 4/3/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Hello Joshi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
>>> HI,
>>> Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
>>> review and suggest
>>> necessary changes.
>>> If some OpenMP expert
On 4/3/19 6:31 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hello Shubham,
>
> On Fri, Mar 29 2019, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
>> Hi, here is my proposal for the above idea. Please review and suggest
>> necessary changes.
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/11MNhuuD7dbwAfSW6ZgFrAys9My1Lw1PuMVcAqeNGr7A/edit?usp=sh
On 4/3/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hello Joshi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> HI,
>> Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
>> review and suggest
>> necessary changes.
>> If some OpenMP experts from GCC have some ideas or changes please
>> suggest.
>
Hello Joshi,
On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
> HI,
> Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
> review and suggest
> necessary changes.
> If some OpenMP experts from GCC have some ideas or changes please suggest.
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1axElw-I
Hello Shubham,
On Fri, Mar 29 2019, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> Hi, here is my proposal for the above idea. Please review and suggest
> necessary changes.
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/11MNhuuD7dbwAfSW6ZgFrAys9My1Lw1PuMVcAqeNGr7A/edit?usp=sharing
I have had a quick look and the proposal se
HI,
Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
review and suggest
necessary changes.
If some OpenMP experts from GCC have some ideas or changes please suggest.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1axElw-I5pTwcjI4iMle5NhLeRCcshIjH5ZHm3GGwsZU/edit?usp=sharing
Thanks,
Sameera
On 3/26/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> That is a correct diagnostics.
>>
>> See Canonical loop form.
>>
>> test-exprOne of the following:
>> var relational-op b
>> b relational-op var
>>
>> ( var relational-op b )
>> is neither of those.
>
> Still se
On Sun, 31 Mar 2019, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote my GSoC Proposal to the "Parallelize GCC with threads" project,
> and if someone is interested in it, I am linking the text here in order
> to get feedback. Please let me know if something is not entirely clear,
> or if there are an
Hi,
I wrote my GSoC Proposal to the "Parallelize GCC with threads" project,
and if someone is interested in it, I am linking the text here in order
to get feedback. Please let me know if something is not entirely clear,
or if there are any problems with the calendar, or if you have any
suggestions
n, Feb 10 2019, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am Shubham Narlawar. Currently, I am a Computer Engineering undergrad
> > student at Pune University, India. I am interested in contributing to GCC
> > for GSOC 2019.
> >
> > We have done a project
Hello Akshatg,
On Tue, Mar 12 2019, Akshatg wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm a 2nd year Master's student at IIT Bombay. I have taken advance
> compiler related courses in the past semesters. I'm interested to work
> on the project "Make C/C++ not automatically promote
> memory_order_consume to memor
ent/d/1UwrBOsiAXsZSClsq1r6tAEw6QdqUzJvgW74SQpcWlIU/edit?usp=sharing
Ray Kim.
-Original Message-
From: "Martin Jambor"
To: "김규래"; ;
Cc: "Jakub Jelinek";
Sent: 2019-03-26 (화) 08:32:51 (GMT+09:00)
Subject: Re: [GSoC 2019] No application template?
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 24 2019, 김규래 wrote:
> That is a correct diagnostics.
>
> See Canonical loop form.
>
> test-expr One of the following:
> var relational-op b
> b relational-op var
>
> ( var relational-op b )
> is neither of those.
Still seems strange to fail for some meaningle
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:30:28PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
> > I'd need to see an example of what you are talking about.
>
> int i;
> #pragma omp parallel for
> for (i = (0) ; (i< (20)) ; i++) {
> printf ("\ntest expression fails due to brackets");
>
On 3/26/19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 05:41:26PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> sameeran joshi writes:
>>
>> > On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> >>> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
>> >>> checks for th
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 05:41:26PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> sameeran joshi writes:
>
> > On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
> >>> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
> >>> checks for the conditions related to a structured blo
sameeran joshi writes:
> On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
>>> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
>>> checks for the conditions related to a structured block
>>> 1.no returns in block
>>
>> returns should be allowed insid
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 24 2019, 김규래 wrote:
> Hello,
> I was trying to write my application for GSoC 2019 but couldn't find an
> application form for GCC.
> Some other organizations seem to have GSoC application forms/templates.
> The gcc GSoC wiki page doesn't mention any.
&g
On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
>> checks for the conditions related to a structured block
>> 1.no returns in block
>
> returns should be allowed inside statement expressions.
If I a
Hello,
I was trying to write my application for GSoC 2019 but couldn't find an
application form for GCC.
Some other organizations seem to have GSoC application forms/templates.
The gcc GSoC wiki page doesn't mention any.
Is the application format free? or did I miss it somewhere?
If
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
> checks for the conditions related to a structured block
> 1.no returns in block
returns should be allowed inside statement expressions.
> 2.no gotos
> 3.no breaks
> a
extensions here is the link
>> (coverage reports,implemented extension's list,bugs found,test cases,
>> and usage are in README file on github)
>> github Link:
>> https://github.com/Sameeranjoshi/csmith/tree/gcc-extensions
>>
>> We choose this as our univer
Hello all,
I'm a 2nd year Master's student at IIT Bombay. I have taken advance
compiler related courses in the past semesters. I'm interested to work
on the project "Make C/C++ not automatically promote
memory_order_consume to memory_order_acquire" this summer. I have read
the documents share
Hello all,
I am a 2nd year Master's student at IIT Bombay. The project "Make C/C++
not automatically promote memory_order_consume to memory_order_acquire"
caught my eye and I would like to be the part of it. I have taken
advance compiler courses in past semesters. I have already build gcc and
Hello Shubham,
On Sun, Feb 10 2019, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am Shubham Narlawar. Currently, I am a Computer Engineering undergrad
> student at Pune University, India. I am interested in contributing to GCC
> for GSOC 2019.
>
> We have done a project from GCC GSOC
test cases,
> and usage are in README file on github)
> github Link: https://github.com/Sameeranjoshi/csmith/tree/gcc-extensions
>
> We choose this as our university project as well, and are still
> fuzzing the extensions on compiler farm.
>
> Based on the
upcoming
> Google Summer of Code 2019. I would be very grateful to get any directions
> to start with so that I can pursue and participate in GSoC 2019 with your
> organization.
we are delighted you found contributing to GCC interesting. Please look
again at the "Before you apply&quo
e and participate in GSoC 2019 with your
organization.
We choose this as our university project as well, and are still
fuzzing the extensions on compiler farm.
Based on the previous work I would like to propose the following idea
for GSoC 2019:
Extending Csmith for OpenMP extensions.
I would implement following constructs of OpenMP
Hi,
I am Shubham Narlawar. Currently, I am a Computer Engineering undergrad
student at Pune University, India. I am interested in contributing to GCC
for GSOC 2019.
We have done a project from GCC GSOC 2018 idea list which is implementing
Csmith fuzzer leveraging GCC C Extensions under the
organization, I have
asked Prathamesh Kulkarni and Honza Hubička to be my co-admins,
because we must have at least two. If anybody else would like to join
us, let me know.
More information together with GSoC 2019 time line is available at
https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com
Thank you, let&#x
44 matches
Mail list logo
