On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 05:09:32PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Tom Tromey wrote:
>
> > > "Joe" == Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Joe> It's best to ignore J.C. Pizarro. He's an attention-seeking troll,
> > Joe> who has just enough technical knowled
Dave Korn wrote:
David Daney wrote on 01 April 2008 17:10:
Does the intent really matter?
Well, it certainly has a bearing on how amenable to modification under
social pressure his behaviour might or might not be.
We have determined this empirically over the course of many months, the
David Daney wrote on 01 April 2008 17:10:
> Does the intent really matter?
Well, it certainly has a bearing on how amenable to modification under
social pressure his behaviour might or might not be.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today
Dave Korn wrote:
Tom Tromey wrote on 01 April 2008 15:34:
"Dave" == Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dave> "Attention-seeking troll", "bad" and "abusive", all seem a bit
Dave> of a harsh way to describe a hapless victim of mental illness to
Dave> me.
In my message, I purposely descri
Tom Tromey wrote on 01 April 2008 15:34:
> > > > > > "Dave" == Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dave> "Attention-seeking troll", "bad" and "abusive", all seem a bit
> Dave> of a harsh way to describe a hapless victim of mental illness to
> Dave> me.
>
> In my message, I purposely des
> "Dave" == Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dave> "Attention-seeking troll", "bad" and "abusive", all seem a bit
Dave> of a harsh way to describe a hapless victim of mental illness to
Dave> me.
In my message, I purposely described his behavior, not him. I don't
know him, I wouldn't p
Diego Novillo wrote on :
> 2008/3/31 Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > > "Joe" == Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Joe> It's best to ignore J.C. Pizarro. He's an attention-seeking
> > troll,
> > There's no benefit that I can see to putting up with this kind of bad
> >
Joe> It's best to ignore J.C. Pizarro. He's an attention-seeking troll,
Joe> who has just enough technical knowledge to derail conversation.
I think that if we've reached the point where an SC member feels the
need to post disclaimers about someone's posts, then that someone
ought to simply be
Hi,
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Joe" == Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Joe> It's best to ignore J.C. Pizarro. He's an attention-seeking troll,
> Joe> who has just enough technical knowledge to derail conversation.
>
> I think that if we've reached the point where
2008/3/31 Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > "Joe" == Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Joe> It's best to ignore J.C. Pizarro. He's an attention-seeking troll,
> Joe> who has just enough technical knowledge to derail conversation.
>
> I think that if we've reached the point where an
> "Joe" == Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joe> It's best to ignore J.C. Pizarro. He's an attention-seeking troll,
Joe> who has just enough technical knowledge to derail conversation.
I think that if we've reached the point where an SC member feels the
need to post disclaimers about som
J.C.,
Please stop harrassing people who, unlike you, are trying to contribute
to making GCC better. You were safe to ignore when you were merely
annoying. If you start driving contributors away, that will be a more
serious problem.
Alexey and everyone else,
It's best to ignore J.C. Pizarro. H
On 2008/3/30, Alexey Salmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are issues of Garbage Collection from libgcc or Boehms's GC
> > that you possibly can't use another allocators that these defaults,
> > unless you have control of the manager of the whole memory,
> > and it's too complex due to
There are issues of Garbage Collection from libgcc or Boehms's GC
Two mistakes in one line. Congratulations J.C. for confusing a
prospective GSoC contributor.
So far your messages were just useless and decreasing signal-to-noise
ratio. Now you've escalated to actually damaging activity.
> There are issues of Garbage Collection from libgcc or Boehms's GC
> that you possibly can't use another allocators that these defaults,
> unless you have control of the manager of the whole memory,
> and it's too complex due to the gigant size of the project.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gcc/src/inclu
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 12:39:13 +0600, "Alexey Salmin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, here's my application. Please, leave your comments as I still
> have two days to fix it if something is wrong :)
>
> Project
> I want to make some improvements in the Lexer/cpplib area:
> 1) Change the way of fi
"Alexey Salmin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, here's my application. Please, leave your comments as I still
> have two days to fix it if something is wrong :)
Thanks for sending this.
> Project
> I want to make some improvements in the Lexer/cpplib area:
> 1) Change the way of file handli
Hello, here's my application. Please, leave your comments as I still
have two days to fix it if something is wrong :)
Project
I want to make some improvements in the Lexer/cpplib area:
1) Change the way of file handling
-- Mmap file into memory if possible instead of allocating a buffer
(if no c
18 matches
Mail list logo
