Re: GNU indirect functions vs. symbol visibility

2016-08-25 Thread Alan Modra
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 01:36:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Alan Modra: > > > glibc people: As the main user of ifuncs, how do you feel about not > > declaring functions hidden that are implemented in glibc by ifuncs? > > We have run into this before, I think: > >

Re: GNU indirect functions vs. symbol visibility

2016-08-25 Thread Florian Weimer
* Alan Modra: > glibc people: As the main user of ifuncs, how do you feel about not > declaring functions hidden that are implemented in glibc by ifuncs? We have run into this before, I think: > It's fine to make them hidden via a v

GNU indirect functions vs. symbol visibility

2016-08-24 Thread Alan Modra
Discussion started here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01678.html On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:51:16PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Alan Modra wrote: > > Given a hidden visibility function declaration, the toolchain can say > > that the function is local to