> Unfortunately I am nearly 100% sure that
> it did break the run-time. Attached is a very
> simple Ada program that works correctly
> when the run-time is compiled at -O2 and
> breaks when the run-time is at -O0.
I cannot reproduce on x86/Linux, runtime compiled with -g. The ACATS and GNAT
tes
> Well it is now up to 13 minutes of compile time
> on that one file when it is 30 seconds at -O0 so
> this doesn't appear to help significantly.
OK, sounds like a real problem then.
--
Eric Botcazou
Eric Botcazou wrote:
Have you seen anything like the gnat1 compile
time I reported yesterday?
Try to configure with --enable-checking=release.
Well it is now up to 13 minutes of compile time
on that one file when it is 30 seconds at -O0 so
this doesn't appear to help significantly.
Eric Botcazou wrote:
Thanks. That doesn't appear to be as bad as
what I am seeing.
Quite good actually.
Have you seen anything like the gnat1 compile
time I reported yesterday?
Try to configure with --enable-checking=release.
No. I will add that to the list of things to d
> Thanks. That doesn't appear to be as bad as
> what I am seeing.
Quite good actually.
> Have you seen anything like the gnat1 compile
> time I reported yesterday?
Try to configure with --enable-checking=release.
> You know.. I turned the optimization of the Ada
> run-time from -O2 -> -O0 to w
Eric Botcazou wrote:
Can anyone report that Ada works on the
head on a SPARC or PowerPC self-hosted
system?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-11/msg00945.html
Thanks. That doesn't appear to be as bad as
what I am seeing.
Have you seen anything like the gnat1 compile
time
> Can anyone report that Ada works on the
> head on a SPARC or PowerPC self-hosted
> system?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-11/msg00945.html
--
Eric Botcazou
Hi,
I am trying to test some RTEMS specific
Ada modifications on the SVN trunk.
I cannot get simple programs to work.
The SPARC target produces executables
which die very early. I haven't looked
into them much but something seems bad.
The PowerPC target is passing bad values
into some subrouti
