Re: GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c)

2006-09-09 Thread Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:27:45PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote: > I am not sure what the 'right' way to do this is. I wound up editing > /usr/share/dejagnu/remote.exp to change 'set timeout 300' to 'set > timeout 2000' and I edited /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp to change > 'set status [remote_

Re: GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c)

2006-09-05 Thread Steve Ellcey
> From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >In case it isn't obvious, I have little or no clue about tcl, expect and > dejagnu. The only time that I've had success in modifying the timeout was by > adding this to /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp: > > set_board_info gcc,timeou

Re: GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c)

2006-08-31 Thread Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:44:52PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > On Aug 30, 2005, at 4:34 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > >I see that it is timing out on a slow machine that I have. I tried > >to look around to find out how and where the timeout limit was set > >and could not find it. [snip] > M-x gr

Re: GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c)

2005-08-31 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Yes, I think you are right. I can see a substantial slowdown in > compilation times on IA64 HP-UX at -O2 (though it doesn't time out > there). > > gcc 4.0.0 - 81 seconds > gcc 3.4.1 - 38 seconds > gcc 3.4.0 - 37 seconds > gcc 3.3.5 - 89 seconds > gcc 3.3.1 - 91 seconds > > 3.3 is slow, 3.4 is fa

Re: GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c)

2005-08-31 Thread Steve Ellcey
> > By hand, I can compile the test in about 3 1/2 minutes on the machine in > > question (the machine may have been busier when the failure occured and thus > > taken longer). > > I think it's a real regression (memory consumption/speed) of the compiler, it > is timing out on all the slow SPARC

Re: GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c)

2005-08-30 Thread Eric Botcazou
> By hand, I can compile the test in about 3 1/2 minutes on the machine in > question (the machine may have been busier when the failure occured and thus > taken longer). I think it's a real regression (memory consumption/speed) of the compiler, it is timing out on all the slow SPARC machines I

Re: GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c)

2005-08-30 Thread Mike Stump
On Aug 30, 2005, at 4:34 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: I see that it is timing out on a slow machine that I have. I tried to look around to find out how and where the timeout limit was set and could not find it. Can someone explain to me how much time a compile is given and where this limit is s

GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c)

2005-08-30 Thread Steve Ellcey
I was looking at a failure of the test gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c on one of my machines and I see that it is timing out on a slow machine that I have. I tried to look around to find out how and where the timeout limit was set and could not find it. Can someone explain to me how much time