On 22/03/13 16:18, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:28 AM, David Brown wrote:
>
>> I use Freescale PPC devices with VLE, and I use Freescale's CodeWarrior
>> to do so. At the start of the project, I looked at CodeSourcery's
>> PPC-EABI tools (I have used CodeSourcery's gcc tools
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:28 AM, David Brown wrote:
> I use Freescale PPC devices with VLE, and I use Freescale's CodeWarrior
> to do so. At the start of the project, I looked at CodeSourcery's
> PPC-EABI tools (I have used CodeSourcery's gcc tools for other targets)
> - but without VLE support,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:03 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Will wrote:
>> James Lemke codesourcery.com> writes:
>>
>>> I have completed the binutils submission for VLE.
>>> I am working on the gcc submission. The test results are looking good
>>> now. Patches wil
On 21/03/13 18:03, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Will wrote:
>> James Lemke codesourcery.com> writes:
>>
>>> I have completed the binutils submission for VLE.
>>> I am working on the gcc submission. The test results are looking good
>>> now. Patches will be posted ver
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Will wrote:
> James Lemke codesourcery.com> writes:
>
>> I have completed the binutils submission for VLE.
>> I am working on the gcc submission. The test results are looking good
>> now. Patches will be posted very soon.
>
> Do you have any update on the work o
On 03/21/2013 09:58 AM, Will wrote:
James Lemke codesourcery.com> writes:
I have completed the binutils submission for VLE.
I am working on the gcc submission. The test results are looking good
now. Patches will be posted very soon.
Do you have any update on the work on VLE-support?
Thank
James Lemke codesourcery.com> writes:
> I have completed the binutils submission for VLE.
> I am working on the gcc submission. The test results are looking good
> now. Patches will be posted very soon.
Do you have any update on the work on VLE-support?
Thanks for any feedback you can provide
Thanks for the feedback. I based my "hope" on the below link:
http://nickclifton.livejournal.com/10857.html
It does look like patches for VLE has reached the GNU binutils -
probably what you are referring to. Please advise what good it is to
have VLE in the binutils, but not in GCC ? I thought on
On 08/08/2012 11:08 AM, William Swashbuckler wrote:
Hi,
I have recently read in several places that GCC now supports the
PowerPC VLE instruction set architecture as a target. However, I have
so far been unable to find any actual documentation on this? AFAICS
the online doc doesn't show any new t
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:17 PM, David Brown wrote:
> Where did you read about this? I talked to CodeSourcery (the main PowerPC
> gcc maintainers) a while back, and they said they had no plans to implement
> VLE - there simply wasn't enough market. That may have changed, however -
> Freescale's
On 08/08/12 17:08, William Swashbuckler wrote:
Hi,
I have recently read in several places that GCC now supports the
PowerPC VLE instruction set architecture as a target. However, I have
so far been unable to find any actual documentation on this? AFAICS
the online doc doesn't show any new target
Hi,
I have recently read in several places that GCC now supports the
PowerPC VLE instruction set architecture as a target. However, I have
so far been unable to find any actual documentation on this? AFAICS
the online doc doesn't show any new target options, see e.g.
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs
12 matches
Mail list logo
