> "Dan" == Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Alternatively, filtering by regex would work just as well for me.
Dan> It *is* a regex :)
Hmm. I type "cpp|preprocessor" into the text area and I get no
results. I also tried emacs-style: cpp\|preprocessor. What am I
missing?
Tom
On 20 Apr 2007 11:42:57 -0600, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian> I proposed automatic e-mail pings, but that wasn't generally
Ian> welcomed.
Bummer. Why?
Dan> If people are okay with this, I have no problem implementing it.
If you're taking feature requests, it would be handy to cano
> "Dave" == Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If you're taking feature requests, it would be handy to canonize the
>> Area field somehow. I was filtering based on "preprocessor" and then
>> yesterday noticed things filed against "libcpp" and "cpp".
Dave> Heh. Guilty as charged.
So
On 20 April 2007 18:43, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Ian> I proposed automatic e-mail pings, but that wasn't generally
> Ian> welcomed.
>
> Bummer. Why?
>
> Dan> If people are okay with this, I have no problem implementing it.
>
> If you're taking feature requests, it would be handy to canonize the
> A
Ian> I proposed automatic e-mail pings, but that wasn't generally
Ian> welcomed.
Bummer. Why?
Dan> If people are okay with this, I have no problem implementing it.
If you're taking feature requests, it would be handy to canonize the
Area field somehow. I was filtering based on "preprocessor" a
We discussed the patch tracker. None of the active maintainers who
were there appear to use it very much or at all.
This is because it does not enable them to easily review patches, only
to see which they have missed ;)
I proposed
automatic e-mail pings, but that wasn't generally wel
