On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 21:26, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 20:56, ASSI wrote:
> >
> > Jonathan Wakely via Gcc writes:
> > > For 13.4 the link on the https://gcc.gnu.org home page for the gcc 13
> > > status goes to https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2025-April/245992.html
> >
On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 20:56, ASSI wrote:
>
> Jonathan Wakely via Gcc writes:
> > For 13.4 the link on the https://gcc.gnu.org home page for the gcc 13
> > status goes to https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2025-April/245992.html
> > which says:
> > "The plan is to do a release candidate for GCC 13.
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 09:55:07PM +0200, ASSI wrote:
> That seems appropriate for the GCC Releases document, while the one I
> linked to is advertised to show "future releases and an alternative view
> of the release history". But I get it that it's just not getting an
> update at this time so th
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc writes:
> For 13.4 the link on the https://gcc.gnu.org home page for the gcc 13
> status goes to https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2025-April/245992.html
> which says:
> "The plan is to do a release candidate for GCC 13.4 on Thursday, May
> 29th, one week after the GCC 14.3
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc writes:
> On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 19:12, ASSI wrote:
>>
>>
>> The current schedule as published at
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html
>>
>> ends with the 16.1 release.
>
> No it doesn't btw - it ends with the 15.1 release and with stage 1 for
> gcc 16, we're still a year
On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 20:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 19:12, ASSI wrote:
> >
> >
> > The current schedule as published at
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html
> >
> > ends with the 16.1 release. Is there an updated / extended version
> > available that shows the pla
On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 19:12, ASSI wrote:
>
>
> The current schedule as published at
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html
>
> ends with the 16.1 release.
No it doesn't btw - it ends with the 15.1 release and with stage 1 for
gcc 16, we're still a year away from the 16.1 release.
> Is there an
On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 19:12, ASSI wrote:
>
>
> The current schedule as published at
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html
>
> ends with the 16.1 release. Is there an updated / extended version
> available that shows the planned releases for the next half year at
> least?
No, but you can extrapol
The current schedule as published at
https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html
ends with the 16.1 release. Is there an updated / extended version
available that shows the planned releases for the next half year at
least? Specifically, I would like to know if (and when) a 12.5 is
planned and when 13.4
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org
Pook
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> fOn Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
Stage 2 has been missing for 7 years now, Stages 3 and 4 seem to blur
together, the "regression only" rule is more like "non-invasive fixes
only" (likewise for the support branches).
fOn Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> Stage 2 has been missing for 7 years now, Stages 3 and 4 seem to blur
>>> together, the "regression only" rule is more like "non-invasive fixes
>>> only" (likewise for the support branches).
>> Don't stage3 and stage4 differ in that substantial change
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Thomas Preud'homme
wrote:
>> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
>> Behalf Of James Greenhalgh
>
> Hi James,
>
>>
>> The stages, timings, and exact rules for which patches are acceptable
>> and when, seem to have drifted quite substantiall
> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of James Greenhalgh
Hi James,
>
> The stages, timings, and exact rules for which patches are acceptable
> and when, seem to have drifted quite substantially from that page.
> Stage 2 has been missing for 7 years now, Stages
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:37:36AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Honggyu Kim wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to know about the stages of development plan so I checked the
> > following article:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html
[Just Bike-shedding...]
the term "stage
> 4" here.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358
>
> Do you think "stage 4" explanation is missing in "GCC Development Plan"
> document?
> If so, can anyone please explain it or write the description on the docume
think "stage 4" explanation is missing in "GCC Development Plan"
document?
If so, can anyone please explain it or write the description on the document?
Thanks,
Honggyu
Piotr Wyderski wrote:
Tobias Burnus wrote:
Well, for the new features in the trunk: Have a look at the release
notes for the upcoming version 4.5 at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html
For C++ 0x (1x?) have also a look at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/cxx0x_status.html
Yes, I know th
Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Well, for the new features in the trunk: Have a look at the release
> notes for the upcoming version 4.5 at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html
> For C++ 0x (1x?) have also a look at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/cxx0x_status.html
Yes, I know those pages pretty well, a
On 01/20/2010 12:17 PM, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> is there something like an unofficial documentation
> of trunk features
Well, for the new features in the trunk: Have a look at the release
notes for the upcoming version 4.5 at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html
For C++ 0x (1x?) have also a loo
On 01/20/2010 12:17 PM, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there something like an unofficial documentation
> of trunk features or a more or less detailed development
> plan of the compiler?
http://catb.org/~esr/writings/homesteading/
with the usual caveats about Open Source vs Free Softwar
Hello,
is there something like an unofficial documentation
of trunk features or a more or less detailed development
plan of the compiler? What I'm trying to say... how do
you know what to work on and what are schedules?
I'm particularly interested in C++0x, SIMDs and optimization
plans.
Best reg
22 matches
Mail list logo
