oops! forgot to cc the list. thanks Per.
- Forwarded Message
From: Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:49:23 AM
Subject: Re: GCC SC request about ecj
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Please see http://www.
> "Per" == Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Per> Note this does not mean importing Eclispe code into the gcc source or
Per> release tree. We need to decide on a practical way to have people
Per> grab a compatible version of ecj.
My short-term plan is to make a branch in gcc svn, and c
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 10:59:58AM -0700, Per Bothner wrote:
> Richard stallman write last night:
>
> I agree to the use of the Eclipse front end to generate
> Java byte codes.
>
> Note this does not mean importing Eclispe code into the gcc source or
> release tree. We need to decide o
Richard stallman write last night:
I agree to the use of the Eclipse front end to generate
Java byte codes.
Note this does not mean importing Eclispe code into the gcc source or
release tree. We need to decide on a practical way to have people
grab a compatible version of ecj.
--
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> Since I still think this is the best way forward, I started work on
Tom> it. I've got a prototype working here.
Tom> I'd like to commit it to a branch on gcc.gnu.org. But, I don't want
Tom> to offend the SC any more than I have to ;-).
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:28:50PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Tom> So, could the SC please discuss the ecj plan and let us know whether
> Tom> it is acceptable? It would also be helpful to have some idea of how
> Tom> long the discussion might take.
>
> Ping. Any progress to report?
I answered
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> So, could the SC please discuss the ecj plan and let us know whether
Tom> it is acceptable? It would also be helpful to have some idea of how
Tom> long the discussion might take.
Ping. Any progress to report?
Since I still think this i
> Ranjit Mathew writes:
Ranjit> Did the SC get to deliberate on this issue? Was this
Ranjit> message:
Ranjit> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-03/msg00558.html
Ranjit> on inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC a
Ranjit> direct result of these discussions or a mere coincidence?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Tromey wrote:
>
> In particular we would like to import a copy of the ecj sources into
> the GCC source tree, so that we can continue to deliver a complete
> compiler system in a single download.
>
> So, could the SC please discuss the ecj plan a
Andrew Haley and I had a long talk about gcj and the eclipse java
compiler (we call it "ecj" for short) while we were at FOSDEM last
week. We concluded that we didn't foresee any serious technical
problems with using ecj as the java language front end to gcj, and
that we would like to move forward
10 matches
Mail list logo
