Re: [9/10 Regression] [PR87833] Intel MIC (emulated) offloading still broken (was: GCC 9.0.1 Status Report (2019-04-25))

Hi Hongtao, I have left Intel 3 years ago. If you have any questions regarding MIC offloading, you can reach me by iver...@gmail.com Hongtao Liu : > I don't konw this guy ilya.ver...@intel.com. > Do you know him/her, H.J? > > -- > BR, > Hongtao || Ilya

Re: [9/10 Regression] [PR87833] Intel MIC (emulated) offloading still broken (was: GCC 9.0.1 Status Report (2019-04-25))

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 7:31 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:02:40PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Hi Jakub! > > > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:56:52 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:47:54PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > > Email to apparen

Re: [9/10 Regression] [PR87833] Intel MIC (emulated) offloading still broken (was: GCC 9.0.1 Status Report (2019-04-25))

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:02:40PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi Jakub! > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:56:52 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:47:54PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > Email to apparently is no longer gets delivered. > > > Is there anyone else from In

Re: [9/10 Regression] [PR87833] Intel MIC (emulated) offloading still broken (was: GCC 9.0.1 Status Report (2019-04-25))

Hi Jakub! On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:56:52 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:47:54PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Email to apparently is no longer gets delivered. > > Is there anyone else from Intel who'd take over maintenance? > > As your patch is to LTO option handling

Re: [9/10 Regression] [PR87833] Intel MIC (emulated) offloading still broken (was: GCC 9.0.1 Status Report (2019-04-25))

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:47:54PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Email to apparently is no longer gets delivered. > Is there anyone else from Intel who'd take over maintenance? As your patch is to LTO option handling, I think you want a review from Honza. At this point I'd lean towards fixing

Re: [9/10 Regression] [PR87833] Intel MIC (emulated) offloading still broken (was: GCC 9.0.1 Status Report (2019-04-25))

Hi! Email to apparently is no longer gets delivered. Is there anyone else from Intel who'd take over maintenance? Grüße Thomas On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:37:17 +0200, I wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 20:38:21 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > branches/gcc-9-branch has > > been created; GC

[9/10 Regression] [PR87833] Intel MIC (emulated) offloading still broken (was: GCC 9.0.1 Status Report (2019-04-25))

Hi! On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 20:38:21 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > branches/gcc-9-branch has > been created; GCC 9.1-rc1 will be built and announced likely tomorrow. Yay! \o/ I just again want to point to '[9/10 Regression] Intel MIC (emulated) offloading: "relocati

Re: GCC 9.0.1 Status Report (2019-04-25)

On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 19:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Status > == > > We have reached zero P1 regressions today and branches/gcc-9-branch has > been created; GCC 9.1-rc1 will be built and announced likely tomorrow. > The branch is now frozen for blocking regressions and documentation > fixes

GCC 9.0.1 Status Report (2019-04-25)

Status == We have reached zero P1 regressions today and branches/gcc-9-branch has been created; GCC 9.1-rc1 will be built and announced likely tomorrow. The branch is now frozen for blocking regressions and documentation fixes only, all changes to the branch require a RM approval now. If no