Hi Roman,
On Wed, 16 May 2012, Роман Саженков wrote:
> It seems like I've found an inaccuracy in GCC 4.7.0 documentation. It is
> about -fdefer-pop optimization option. The point is that this option is
> mentioned in the list of optimization flags which -O1 turns on (Chapter
&g
On 12-05-25 17:53 , Aaron Gray wrote:
Just to let people know I have succeeded in building gcc-4.7.0 with
--enable-build-with-cxx (All stages built as C++) on latest Cygwin
with GCC 4.5.3 and on MinGW32 with a rebuilt GCC 4.6.2 as the GCC
4.6.2 that came with MinGW was missing stdarg.h and
Hi,
Just to let people know I have succeeded in building gcc-4.7.0 with
--enable-build-with-cxx (All stages built as C++) on latest Cygwin
with GCC 4.5.3 and on MinGW32 with a rebuilt GCC 4.6.2 as the GCC
4.6.2 that came with MinGW was missing stdarg.h and stddef.h and
possibly other headers
Hello, GNU GCC team.
It seems like I've found an inaccuracy in GCC 4.7.0 documentation. It is about
-fdefer-pop optimization option. The point is that this option is mentioned in
the list of optimization flags which -O1 turns on (Chapter 3: GCC Command
Options, part 3.10 Options That Co
Oops, meant to CC gcc-patches ...
On 21 April 2012 01:01, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 21 April 2012 00:37, Todd Edwards wrote:
>> In Section "New Languages and Language specific improvements" In subsection
>> "C Family" Objective-C is repeated twice. :
>> "A new experimental -ftrack-macro-expansi
On 21 April 2012 00:37, Todd Edwards wrote:
> In Section "New Languages and Language specific improvements" In subsection
> "C Family" Objective-C is repeated twice. :
> "A new experimental -ftrack-macro-expansion option was added for C, C++,
> Objective-C, Objective-C and Fortran. It allows the co
In Section "New Languages and Language specific improvements" In
subsection "C Family" Objective-C is repeated twice. :
"A new experimental -ftrack-macro-expansion option was added for C, C++,
Objective-C, Objective-C and Fortran. It allows the compiler to emit
diagnostic about the current macro
$ ./config.guess:
i686-pc-linux-gnu
$ i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-4.7.0 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-4.7.0
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.0/lto-wrapper
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4.7.0/configure --disable-checking
On 03/30/2012 05:46 PM, stuart wrote:
> I can not seem to get gcc 4.7.0 to compile; it will not complete the
> configuration stage complaining about missing packages (GMP, MPFR and
> MPC).
Go into the top-level source directory in the unpacked gcc sources
and run this script:
stuart writes:
> I am not sure this is the right place to ask this
It's not. The right place is gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org. Please take any
followups there. Thanks.
> I can not seem to get gcc 4.7.0 to compile; it will not complete the
> configuration stage complaining about mi
Hi,
I am not sure this is the right place to ask this, but how do I get gcc
4.7.0 to compile as a cross compiler for the Atmel AVR series?
The native host is an x86 IA32 box running Slackware, gcc 3.3.6.
I have successfully compiled and installed (in /usr/local/avr) binutils
2.22 and set my
Hello,
Following the recommendations on
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/finalinstall.html, I'm reporting my success
at building gcc 4.7.0 on amd64-unknown-openbsd4.8 because this platform
is not listed in http://gcc.gnu.org/buildstat.html. My build is only
"mostly" successful; I
According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any
further questions or concerns, please reply to this email.
nt we have prepared the release of GCC 4.7.0 which
continues the series of free software high-quality industry-standard
compilers.
GCC 4.7.0 is a major release, containing substantial new
functionality not available in GCC 4.6.x or previous GCC releases.
GCC 4.7 features support for software transactio
2012/3/19 Jonathan Wakely :
> 2012/3/19 Jonathan Wakely :
>> 2012/3/19 Paweł Sikora:
>>> On Wednesday 14 of March 2012 12:22:41 Richard Guenther wrote:
>>>>
>>>> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>>>>
>>&
Hi,
On 03/19/2012 01:38 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
2012/3/19 Jonathan Wakely:
2012/3/19 Paweł Sikora:
On Wednesday 14 of March 2012 12:22:41 Richard Guenther wrote:
GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
A second release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
ftp
2012/3/19 Jonathan Wakely :
> 2012/3/19 Paweł Sikora:
>> On Wednesday 14 of March 2012 12:22:41 Richard Guenther wrote:
>>>
>>> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>>>
>>> A second release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
2012/3/19 Paweł Sikora:
> On Wednesday 14 of March 2012 12:22:41 Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>>
>> A second release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
>>
>> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/
On Wednesday 14 of March 2012 12:22:41 Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>
> A second release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120314
>
> and shortly i
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 03:57:51PM +0100, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> I was just confused by the "please report bugs" which gives rise to
> the (incorrect) assumption that the goal is to actually fix these
> bugs -- only if this is possible in a timely manner, of course, and
> won't delay the release
Richard Guenther schrieb:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Richard Guenther schrieb:
GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
A second release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120314
and shortly its mirrors
On 16 March 2012 13:45, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Richard Guenther schrieb:
>>
>> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>>
>> A second release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
>>
>> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-2012
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Richard Guenther schrieb:
> > GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
> >
> > A second release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
> >
> > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120314
Richard Guenther schrieb:
GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
A second release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120314
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 185376.
I have so far
GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
A second release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120314
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 185376.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release
at 8:44 AM, Richard Guenther
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>> >> >
>> >> > The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
>> >> >
>> >> > ftp://g
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, NightStrike wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>>> >
>>
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, NightStrike wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, NightStrike wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> >
> >> > GCC 4.7.0 Release Candid
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, NightStrike wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> >
>>> > GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, NightStrike wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> >
>> > GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>> >
>> > The first r
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, NightStrike wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
> >
> > The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
> >
> > ftp://gcc.gnu.
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, NightStrike wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, NightStrike wrote:
Building gmp/mpfr/mpc in tree fails in the configure-stage1-mpc step
with the current version of mpfr version 3.1.0, out since last
October, and mpc, version 0.9,
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, NightStrike wrote:
>
>> Building gmp/mpfr/mpc in tree fails in the configure-stage1-mpc step
>> with the current version of mpfr version 3.1.0, out since last
>> October, and mpc, version 0.9, out since Feb of 2011. I'm gue
On 03/08/2012 11:47 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/08/12 00:17, Sebastian Huber wrote:
thanks for the hints. Thus if we want to use the C++ atomic operations on
32-bit ARM in RTEMS we have to implement everything in
libgcc/config/arm/linux-atomic.c
and place it in e.g.
libgcc/config/arm
On 03/08/12 00:17, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> thanks for the hints. Thus if we want to use the C++ atomic operations on
> 32-bit ARM in RTEMS we have to implement everything in
>
> libgcc/config/arm/linux-atomic.c
>
> and place it in e.g.
>
> libgcc/config/arm/rtems-atomic.c
Possibly. It reall
Hello Andrew and Richard,
On 03/07/2012 08:38 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/07/12 10:44, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> rth, you are familiar with how this part is suppose to hook up properly...
>
> I traced the code in expand_mem_thread_fence, and the sync_synchronize is
being emiited by:
>
>
On 03/07/12 10:44, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> rth, you are familiar with how this part is suppose to hook up properly...
>
> I traced the code in expand_mem_thread_fence, and the sync_synchronize is
> being emiited by:
>
> else if (synchronize_libfunc != NULL_RTX)
> emit_library_call (synch
On 03/07/2012 12:44 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 03/07/2012 10:11 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
I run the GCC testsuite for GCC 4.7.0 20120307
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg00782.html
I got a lot of errors like this:
FAIL: g++.dg/simulate-thread/atomics-1.C -O0 -g
On 03/07/2012 10:11 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
I run the GCC testsuite for GCC 4.7.0 20120307
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg00782.html
I got a lot of errors like this:
FAIL: g++.dg/simulate-thread/atomics-1.C -O0 -g (test for excess
errors)
148796 Excess errors
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, NightStrike wrote:
Building gmp/mpfr/mpc in tree fails in the configure-stage1-mpc step
with the current version of mpfr version 3.1.0, out since last
October, and mpc, version 0.9, out since Feb of 2011. I'm guessing
the sources moved or something.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
Hello,
I run the GCC testsuite for GCC 4.7.0 20120307
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg00782.html
I got a lot of errors like this:
FAIL: g++.dg/simulate-thread/atomics-1.C -O0 -g (test for excess errors)
148796 Excess errors:
148797
/home/sh/rtems-testing/gcc/b-arm-gcc/arm
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>
> The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302
>
> and shortly its mirrors. It
On 03/02/12 05:44, Richard Guenther wrote:
GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 184777.
I
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>
> The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302
>
> and shortly its mirrors. It
On 03/05/2012 10:12 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/03/2012 02:58 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Ralf Corsepius
wrote:
On 03/02/2012 02:44 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/03/2012 02:58 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Ralf Corsepius
> > wrote:
> > > On 03/02/2012 02:44 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> On 03/02/2012 08:40 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> If all goes well, I'd like to release 4.7.0 in about three weeks.
I'll drop it on Solaris. Give it a push. Do we realy really need that
ppl/cloog stuff? I have never seen it build and pass any tests, ever,
even once, on Solar
On 03/02/2012 08:40 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
If all goes well, I'd like to release 4.7.0 in about three weeks.
I'll drop it on Solaris. Give it a push. Do we realy really need that
ppl/cloog stuff? I have never seen it build and pass any tests, ever,
even once, on Solaris with or without Sun St
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 02:04:49PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > it would be nice to see a fixincl update for 4.6/4.7 to support
> > header as a workaround for PR50916.
>
> That bug's not even open, pointing it out after the RC has been made
> isn't going to help get it looked at for 4.7.0
T
On 03/03/2012 02:58 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Ralf Corsepius
wrote:
On 03/02/2012 02:44 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org
2012/3/3 Paweł Sikora:
> On Friday 02 of March 2012 14:44:45 Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>>
>> The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
>>
>> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Ralf Corsepius
wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 02:44 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>>
>> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>>
>> The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
>>
>> ftp://gc
On 03/02/2012 02:44 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 184777
On Friday 02 of March 2012 14:44:45 Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>
> The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302
>
> and shortly its mirrors
> Dennis Clarke writes:
>
>>> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>>>
>>> The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
>>>
>>> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302
>>>
>>> and
>>> If all goes well, I'd like to release 4.7.0 in about three weeks.
>>
>> I'll drop it on Solaris. Give it a push. Do we realy really need that
>> ppl/cloog stuff? I have never seen it build and pass any tests, ever,
>> even once, on Solaris with or without Sun Studio compilers or GCC or
>> praye
Dennis Clarke writes:
>> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>>
>> The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
>>
>> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302
>>
>> and shortly its mirrors. It has been g
>
> GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
>
> The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302
>
> and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 184777.
>
>
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:35:52PM +0100, Mioljub Ivanovic wrote:
> GCC 4.7.0 listed, but there isn't link for download!
4.7.0 hasn't been released yet, just a release candidate - 4.7.0-rc1.
The actual release will happen in a few weeks.
If you want to try the release candidate, th
GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 184777.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release
GCC 4.7.0 listed, but there isn't link for download!
On 03/02/2012 12:15 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
The GCC 4.7 branch has been created and a first release candidate
is being prepared right now. The branch is closed for now.
Just be clear (I think the information could be useful in general):
mainline can be already considered open for Stage 1 co
The GCC 4.7 branch has been created and a first release candidate
is being prepared right now. The branch is closed for now.
Previous Report
===
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-02/msg00441.html
The next report will announce the release candidate.
Status
==
The trunk is still in regression and documentation fixes only state
(so-called stage4).
We have reached a point where it is sufficiently stable for a first
release candidate. If there appear no serious release blockers in
the next few days expect a release candidate this week. As
Status
==
GCC is now in stage4, only regression and documentation fixes are being
accepted. The trunk will remain in this state until it is sufficiently
stable for release. Then we will create the 4.7 branch and do a first
release candidate.
The overall status looks nice, please keep up the
Status
==
Stage 3 is now officially over, after a bit more than two months.
The GCC trunk is now in regression and documentation fixes only
state (so-called stage4). The trunk will remain in this state
until it is sufficiently stable for release. At this point we
will create the 4.7 branch
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Gary Funck wrote:
> On 12/06/11 01:18:28, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > [...] It still seems reasonable to aim for
> > entering Stage 4 (regression fixes and documentation changes only) in
> > early January and the 4.7.0 release in March or April.
>
> At what point in time would
On 12/06/11 01:18:28, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> [...] It still seems reasonable to aim for
> entering Stage 4 (regression fixes and documentation changes only) in
> early January and the 4.7.0 release in March or April.
At what point in time would the GCC 4.7 branch be created,
and the trunk would
Status
==
GCC trunk remains in stage 3, bug fixes and documentation changes only
(subject to the usual freedom of maintainers to judge what changes are
appropriate in their areas of the compiler). The CR16 and Tile ports
and the resurrection of the Interix OS port could still go in if
updated
Hello!
x86-specific part of this patch was committed to the trunk recently.
There is also target-independent part, which covers memset/memcopy for
the smallest sizes (from 1 to ~256 bytes). In contrast to existing
implementation, it has a cost model to choose the fastest move-mode
(which could be
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> during the last minute, patches submitted during stage1
> may be still accepted, if they don't need significant rewrites,
> but please try to get them in soon. Otherwise only bugfixes
> and documentation fixes are allowed for the trunk.
To be clear sinc
Status
==
The GCC trunk is now in stage3, even TM branch has been merged
during the last minute, patches submitted during stage1
may be still accepted, if they don't need significant rewrites,
but please try to get them in soon. Otherwise only bugfixes
and documentation fixes are allowed for
Hello!
> The GCC trunk is still in stage1. Stage1 will last until
> Nov 7th (including, use your timezone to your advantage) after
> which we will have been in stage1 for nearth 8 months.
> In stage3 the trunk will be open for general bugfixing, no
> new features will be accepted.
There is a pat
Status
==
The GCC trunk is still in stage1. Stage1 will last until
Nov 7th (including, use your timezone to your advantage) after
which we will have been in stage1 for nearth 8 months.
In stage3 the trunk will be open for general bugfixing, no
new features will be accepted.
Now is time to b
-Original Message-
From: Gary Funck [mailto:g...@intrepid.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:00 PM
To: Jakub Jelinek
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Joseph S. Myers
Subject: Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09)
On 09/09/11 09:09:30, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> [...] What is the status
Website updated as follows.
Gerald
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.813
diff -u -r1.813 index.html
--- index.html 12 Sep 2011 00:04:45 - 1.813
+++ index.html 12 Oct
Status
==
Trunk remains in Stage 1 and based on the 4.6 release schedule this
should end around the end of October unless a small delay is useful to
help merge any development branches. Of the branches mentioned in the
last status report, it appears that only transactional-memory and
cxx-mem-
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 08:51 -0500, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek writes:
>
> > In particular, is transactional-memory branch mergeable within
> > a month and half, at least some parts of cxx-mem-model branch,
> > bitfield lowering? What is the status of lra, reload-2a, pph,
>
> Torvald
On 09/09/11 09:09:30, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> [...] What is the status of lra, reload-2a, pph,
> cilkplus, gupc (I assume at least some of these are 4.8+ material)?
For GUPC, we are targeting GCC 4.8.
thanks,
- Gary
> On 09/09/2011 03:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> Status
>> ==
>>
>> The trunk is in Stage 1, which, if we follow roughly the 4.6
>> release schedule, should end around end of October.
>> At this point I'd like to gather the status of the various
>> development branches that haven't been merged
On 09/09/2011 01:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
bitfield lowering? What is the status of lra, reload-2a, pph,
cilkplus, gupc (I assume at least some of these are 4.8+ material)?
The bits on reload-v2a provide range splitting and a second chance at
assigning a hard reg for unallocated allocnos. Th
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> In particular, is transactional-memory branch mergeable within
> a month and half, at least some parts of cxx-mem-model branch,
> bitfield lowering? What is the status of lra, reload-2a, pph,
Torvald and I are looking into getting things merge read, but...
The main prob
On 09/09/2011 03:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Status
==
The trunk is in Stage 1, which, if we follow roughly the 4.6
release schedule, should end around end of October.
At this point I'd like to gather the status of the various
development branches that haven't been merged into trunk yet
and
On 09/09/2011 03:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
In particular, is transactional-memory branch mergeable within
a month and half, at least some parts of cxx-mem-model branch,
There will certainly be some parts of the branch which would be
appropriate for merging with mainline in october. We ough
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Status
> ==
>
> The trunk is in Stage 1, which, if we follow roughly the 4.6
> release schedule, should end around end of October.
> At this point I'd like to gather the status of the various
> development branches that haven't been merged
Status
==
The trunk is in Stage 1, which, if we follow roughly the 4.6
release schedule, should end around end of October.
At this point I'd like to gather the status of the various
development branches that haven't been merged into trunk yet
and whether it is possible to merge them with such
Status
==
As 4.6 has branched, the trunk is again in Stage 1, open for
development. Please go ahead and begin checking in approved
patches. Please try to coordinate so that we do not have
multiple overlapping radical changes. Please announce your
intent to commit a major in advance of doing
87 matches
Mail list logo
