On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:45:27PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > A GCC 4.5.0 release candidate is available at:
> >
> > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5.0-RC-20100406/
> >
> > Please test the tarballs and report any problems to Bugzilla.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 6 April 2010 22:02, Jerome Quinn wrote:
Is there a clean way of making that happen?
>>>
>>> Can't you just put the cloog sources in-tree as well?
>>
>> The install docs don't mention that possibility. The last time I
>> tried to bu
On 6 April 2010 22:02, Jerome Quinn wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> source tree per the instructions. It would be nice to have cloog use
>>> the gmp that will be built as part of the gcc bootstrap.
>>>
>>> Is there a clean way of making that happen?
>>
>> Can't
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> source tree per the instructions. It would be nice to have cloog use
>> the gmp that will be built as part of the gcc bootstrap.
>>
>> Is there a clean way of making that happen?
>
> Can't you just put the cloog sources in-tree as well?
T
On 6 April 2010 21:10, Jerome Quinn wrote:
>
> What is the minimum gmp for cloog-ppl? Is it the same as for gcc? My
> system gmp is too old for gcc so I've got gmp 4.3.2 placed in the gcc
> source tree per the instructions. It would be nice to have cloog use
> the gmp that will be built as part
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Marc Glisse
wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Jerome Quinn wrote:
>
>> undefined reference to `mp_get_memory_functions'
>
> This means your version of GMP is too old. configure should probably catch
> this.
What is the minimum gmp for cloog-ppl? Is it the same as for g
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Jerome Quinn wrote:
undefined reference to `mp_get_memory_functions'
This means your version of GMP is too old. configure should probably catch
this.
--
Marc Glisse
I just downloaded the 20100406 snapshot and tried to build, however,
could not get cloog-ppl to build. I know it's not mandatory, but
there's an issue here.
I pulled down both ppl and cloog-ppl from the same location as the
snapshot, so ppl-0.10.2 and cloog-ppl-0.15.9. On a Centos 5.4 x86_64
sys
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:45:27PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> A GCC 4.5.0 release candidate is available at:
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5.0-RC-20100406/
>
> Please test the tarballs and report any problems to Bugzilla.
> CC me on the bugs if you believe they are regression
A GCC 4.5.0 release candidate is available at:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5.0-RC-20100406/
Please test the tarballs and report any problems to Bugzilla.
CC me on the bugs if you believe they are regressions from
previous releases severe enough to block the 4.5.0 release.
Thanks,
Rich
10 matches
Mail list logo