Tom Tromey wrote:
Yes, it does. I still haven't deleted the code that uses this, but it
will never be invoked.
I think that's fine; as long as there are no actual user-visible
problems with Java, that shouldn't block merging Sandra/Kazu's changes.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTE
> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Kazu Hirata wrote:
>> The Java frontend uses a
>> flag within the TREE_LIST object that makes up TYPE_ARG_TYPEs, so it
>> is blocking the propsed merge. (Java maintainers are planning to
>> fix this in future.)
Mark> Yes, I agree that
Kazu Hirata wrote:
Hi Mark,
I don't believe there is a GCC 4.3 project page to merge the work that
you folks did on CALL_EXPRs and TYPE_ARG_TYPEs. Would one of you
please create a Wiki page for that?
What would you suggest me to do for missing bits? Specifically, most
backends with the e
Hi Mark,
I don't believe there is a GCC 4.3 project page to merge the work that
you folks did on CALL_EXPRs and TYPE_ARG_TYPEs. Would one of you please
create a Wiki page for that?
What would you suggest me to do for missing bits? Specifically, most backends
with the exception of x86 are
Sandra Loosemore wrote:
Mark Mitchell wrote:
I don't believe there is a GCC 4.3 project page to merge the work that
you folks did on CALL_EXPRs and TYPE_ARG_TYPEs. Would one of you
please create a Wiki page for that?
There are already a bunch of notes about this on the LTO page:
http://gc
Mark Mitchell wrote:
I don't believe there is a GCC 4.3 project page to merge the work that
you folks did on CALL_EXPRs and TYPE_ARG_TYPEs. Would one of you please
create a Wiki page for that?
There are already a bunch of notes about this on the LTO page:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOp
Kazu, Sandra --
I don't believe there is a GCC 4.3 project page to merge the work that
you folks did on CALL_EXPRs and TYPE_ARG_TYPEs. Would one of you please
create a Wiki page for that?
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(650) 331-3385 x713
