Re: Fw: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04)

2006-06-07 Thread Ayal Zaks
"Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/06/2006 16:58:27: > On 6/6/06, Ayal Zaks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > This status report has been a long time coming, for which I apologize. > > > > > > As fwprop is no longer on the table for 4.2, and as the vectorizer > > > improvements

Re: Fw: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04)

2006-06-06 Thread Richard Guenther
On 6/6/06, Ayal Zaks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This status report has been a long time coming, for which I apologize. > > As fwprop is no longer on the table for 4.2, and as the vectorizer > improvements seem to have stalled due to a combination of lack of review > and Dorit's leave, That is

Re: Fw: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04)

2006-06-06 Thread Ayal Zaks
> This status report has been a long time coming, for which I apologize. > > As fwprop is no longer on the table for 4.2, and as the vectorizer > improvements seem to have stalled due to a combination of lack of review > and Dorit's leave, That is unfortunate. Dorit did make a sincere effort to p

Re: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04)

2006-06-06 Thread Bernd Schmidt
Joern RENNECKE wrote: In http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-06/msg00120.html, you wrote: As fwprop is no longer on the table for 4.2, and as the vectorizer improvements seem to have stalled due to a combination of lack of review and Dorit's leave, I think it's time to declare 4.2 feature-complete.

Re: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04)

2006-06-05 Thread Mark Mitchell
Joern RENNECKE wrote: > In http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-06/msg00120.html, you wrote: > >> As fwprop is no longer on the table for 4.2, and as the vectorizer >> improvements seem to have stalled due to a combination of lack of review >> and Dorit's leave, I think it's time to declare 4.2 feature-

Re: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04)

2006-06-05 Thread Joern RENNECKE
In http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-06/msg00120.html, you wrote: As fwprop is no longer on the table for 4.2, and as the vectorizer improvements seem to have stalled due to a combination of lack of review and Dorit's leave, I think it's time to declare 4.2 feature-complete. I am still waiting fo

Re: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04)

2006-06-04 Thread Daniel Berlin
Mark Mitchell wrote: > This status report has been a long time coming, for which I apologize. > > As fwprop is no longer on the table for 4.2, and as the vectorizer > improvements seem to have stalled due to a combination of lack of review > and Dorit's leave, I think it's time to declare 4.2 feat

GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04)

2006-06-04 Thread Mark Mitchell
This status report has been a long time coming, for which I apologize. As fwprop is no longer on the table for 4.2, and as the vectorizer improvements seem to have stalled due to a combination of lack of review and Dorit's leave, I think it's time to declare 4.2 feature-complete. That leaves us l