Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

> Indeed this is clearly correct. And one does wonder how this > missing line has managed to not cause problems elsewhere... I've installed the patch on the mainline, after bootstrapping/regtesting it on x86_64-suse-linux. Do you want me to put it on the 4.0 branch too? -- Eric Botcazou

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

BTW, did you get a chance to look into: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24003 I haven't yet, but I normally use x86_64, so I'm not running into it. And I'm also confused about the EH_REGION stuff.

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

This restores bootstrap on x86 and x86_64-linux, thanks for looking into this. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg01332.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg01333.html BTW, did you get a chance to look into: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24003 which i

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

On 9/29/05, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sparc64-linux > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg01019.html > > Just to make it clear: that's not a SPARC 64-bit Ada compiler, only a 32-bit > Ada compiler with a questionable name. Right! -- Cheers, /ChJ

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

> Other platforms with one or few ACATS failures: [...] > sparc-solaris2.8 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg01077.html The problem is generic (PR ada/20753), although it only shows up in the ACATS testsuite at -O2 on SPARC and PA for some reasons. > sparc64-linux > http://g

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 07:32:46AM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote: > The real fix is below, though I haven't run it throuh a testing cycle yet. > I was wondering how this ever worked: Indeed this is clearly correct. And one does wonder how this missing line has managed to not cause problems elsewher

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

Laurent GUERBY wrote: > The patch to restore Ada bootstrap is a one liner: just revert > the gimplify.c part of 2005-09-24 Richard Henderson's change > in your tree (see below). > > I don't know what is the policy on patches that break Ada on x86-linux > (here by revealing a latent middle-end bug

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

The patch to restore Ada bootstrap is a one liner: just revert the gimplify.c part of 2005-09-24 Richard Henderson's change in your tree (see below). The real fix is below, though I haven't run it throuh a testing cycle yet. I was wondering how this ever worked: *** stor-layout.c

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

The patch to restore Ada bootstrap is a one liner: just revert the gimplify.c part of 2005-09-24 Richard Henderson's change in your tree (see below). I don't know what is the policy on patches that break Ada on x86-linux (here by revealing a latent middle-end bug - but I think latent or not policy

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Many thanks to people enabling Ada in their builds! I'd like to enable it for 4.1 CVS but that one is failing since last week as reported in bugzilla :-( Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE LINUX Products GmbH

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

> Many thanks to people enabling Ada in their builds! Indeed, thanks to you, and thanks to Laurent for collecting these results, and also filing bugzilla PRs when regressions are detected. Arno

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

Zero ACATS fail on three platforms: x86-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg01292.html x86_64-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg01293.html s390-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg01257.html Other platforms with one or few ACATS failur