-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Mitchell wrote:
| GCC 3.4.4 RC1 is available here:
|
| ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-3.4.4-20050510/
|
| As usual, please test -- by using exactly those tarballs, so that we can
| detect packging errors. Put problems into Bugzilla, and Cc
> Etienne Lorrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If I compile that with GCC-3.4, I get:
>>
>> $ size tmp.o
>> textdata bss dec hex filename
>> 243 0 0 243 f3 tmp.o
>>
>> With GCC-4.0:
>>
>> $ size tmp.o
>> textdata bss dec hex filename
>>
> Etienne Lorrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If I compile that with GCC-3.4, I get:
>>
>> $ size tmp.o
>> textdata bss dec hex filename
>> 243 0 0 243 f3 tmp.o
>>
>> With GCC-4.0:
>>
>> $ size tmp.o
>> textdata bss dec hex filename
>>
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Etienne Lorrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some of those problem may also exist in GCC-4.0 because this
version (and the 4.1 I tested) gives me an increase of 60% of the
code size compared to 3.4.3.
This is a serious regression which should be submitted in Bugzilla. Would
you
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 23:35 -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> GCC 3.4.4 RC1 is available here:
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-3.4.4-20050510/
>
> As usual, please test -- by using exactly those tarballs, so that we can
> detect packging errors. Put problems into Bugzill
> size -f tmp.o
>textdata bss dec hex filename
> 322 0 0 322 142 tst.o
>
> Looking at the debugging dump shows that the there's a lot of
> variables generate by SRA, indeed after adding
>
> -fno-tree-sra
>
> textdata bss dec hex fi
"Etienne Lorrain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Etienne Lorrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Some of those problem may also exist in GCC-4.0 because this
> >> version (and the 4.1 I tested) gives me an increase of 60% of the
> >> code size compared to 3.4.3.
> >
> >
>
Etienne Lorrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I compile that with GCC-3.4, I get:
>
> $ size tmp.o
> textdata bss dec hex filename
> 243 0 0 243 f3 tmp.o
>
> With GCC-4.0:
>
> $ size tmp.o
> textdata bss dec hex filename
> 387 0
> Etienne Lorrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Some of those problem may also exist in GCC-4.0 because this
>> version (and the 4.1 I tested) gives me an increase of 60% of the
>> code size compared to 3.4.3.
>
>
> This is a serious regression which should be submitted in Bugzilla. Would
> y
Etienne Lorrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some of those problem may also exist in GCC-4.0 because this
> version (and the 4.1 I tested) gives me an increase of 60% of the
> code size compared to 3.4.3.
This is a serious regression which should be submitted in Bugzilla. Would
you please ta
> GCC 3.4.4 RC1 is available here:
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-3.4.4-20050510/
I downloaded and rebuild for ia32 with latest pre binutils on
my project and noticed an increase of size. I am compiling with -Os
because size is very important in my case - so I invert
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> GCC 3.4.4 RC1 is available here:
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-3.4.4-20050510/
>
> As usual, please test -- by using exactly those tarballs, so that we can
> detect packging errors. Put problems into Bugzilla, and Cc: me. At
> this poi
GCC 3.4.4 RC1 is available here:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-3.4.4-20050510/
As usual, please test -- by using exactly those tarballs, so that we can
detect packging errors. Put problems into Bugzilla, and Cc: me. At
this point, the only problems that would block the release would be
13 matches
Mail list logo
