(This should have been on the gcc-help list.)
> I may be remembering wrong, but -- doesn't dynamic_cast look for a vtable?
It uses a vtable if one is present, it can't cause one to be
introduced, so ...
>So if you do a dynamic cast mentioning that class you'd get such a reference.
No.
> Or is
> On Jun 6, 2021, at 5:41 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> I have a class which is NOT, as far as I can see, polymorphic.
>
> It doesn't inherit from any other class and none of its methods are
> declared virtual. The class implementation and all its callers all
> compile just fine.
>
> Is there s
On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 17:41 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> How can I figure out why the compiler decides, while compiling
> foo.cxx, that MyClass is virtual and needs a vtable when as far as I
> can tell it's not (if I use nm on MyClass.o I see no hints of vtable
> etc.)
Err... I think this might have
I have a class which is NOT, as far as I can see, polymorphic.
It doesn't inherit from any other class and none of its methods are
declared virtual. The class implementation and all its callers all
compile just fine.
Is there some other way that a class can be thought to be virtual,
stealthily (
