Re: GCC-TM dependency build

2010-04-12 Thread Richard Henderson
On 04/09/2010 03:16 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: Is the only C++ header that causes a problem? is exactly equivalent to because it only declares macros, which are not in namespace std anyway. So if that's the only problem, using instead of would solve it. No, we also use , so avoiding the

Re: GCC-TM dependency build

2010-04-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 9 April 2010 17:00, Richard Henderson wrote: > > I have no idea how to fix this.  Ideas? Maybe a dumb question, I don't know the context of this problem... Is the only C++ header that causes a problem? is exactly equivalent to because it only declares macros, which are not in namespace std

Re: GCC-TM dependency build

2010-04-09 Thread Richard Henderson
On 04/08/2010 09:59 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > The problem is that now the problem is present on a serial make (ala, > "/src/configure && make"). I've reliably reproduced this. As far as I can tell, it's a problem of makefile variable expansion in the top-level make. For the folks just joining