On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 07:44 -0500, Steven J. Hill wrote:
> Richard Henderson wrote:
> >
> > Not a bug. The inline marker is merely suggestive. You told
> > the compiler to optimize for size, and it is doing that.
> >
> > If you absolutely have to have the function inlined, then you
> > need to
Richard Henderson wrote:
Not a bug. The inline marker is merely suggestive. You told
the compiler to optimize for size, and it is doing that.
If you absolutely have to have the function inlined, then you
need to use __attribute__((__always_inline__)).
This makes sense, but I also have a bin
"Steven J. Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have discovered what appears to be an optimization bug with '-Os'
> in GCC-4.1.0 for the MIPS architecture. It appears that functions
> which are declared as 'inline' are being ignored and instead turned
> into to function calls which is breaking th
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:59:15PM -0500, Steven J. Hill wrote:
> I have discovered what appears to be an optimization bug with '-Os'
> in GCC-4.1.0 for the MIPS architecture. It appears that functions
> which are declared as 'inline' are being ignored and instead turned
> into to function calls ..
Greetings.
I have discovered what appears to be an optimization bug with '-Os'
in GCC-4.1.0 for the MIPS architecture. It appears that functions
which are declared as 'inline' are being ignored and instead turned
into to function calls which is breaking the dynamic linker loader
for uClibc on MIP
