On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:59:10AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andrew Carlotti via Gcc:
>
> > I've also seen the GCC documentation for the ifunc attribute [1].
> > This states that "the indirect function needs to be defined in the
> > same translation unit as the resolver function". This is
* Andrew Carlotti via Gcc:
> I've also seen the GCC documentation for the ifunc attribute [1].
> This states that "the indirect function needs to be defined in the
> same translation unit as the resolver function". This is not how
> function multiversioning is currently implemented. Instead, the
Hi,
I've been looking into existing function multiversioning implementations (while
working to add support for fmv in GCC on aarch64). It seems there are various
inconsistencies among current implementations, and it's unclear to me which (if
any) of these differences could be problematic. There'
