> Honza,
>
> Your patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg00976.html
> has left a number of fortran test cases broken (e.g. gfortran.dg/select_2).
>
> The problem seems to be that you used the aux field as a replacement for
> rbi->copy_number, but tree_verify_flow_info assumes au
Honza,
Your patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg00976.html
has left a number of fortran test cases broken (e.g. gfortran.dg/select_2).
The problem seems to be that you used the aux field as a replacement for
rbi->copy_number, but tree_verify_flow_info assumes aux is cleared b
