Ulf Magnusson wrote:
On 11/29/06, Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> While searching for an answer, I noticed that lots of people seem
> to have had problems with cross-compilation that to me look more
> like problems in the documentation, which I find a bit sad.
R
"Ulf Magnusson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd be happy to contribute some documentation on this. I just hope I
> have a firm enough grip on the issue. Where should I send drafts for
> review? Is there some other resource I should be aware of besides
> http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html?
Thank
On 11/29/06, Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> While searching for an answer, I noticed that lots of people seem
> to have had problems with cross-compilation that to me look more
> like problems in the documentation, which I find a bit sad.
Rather than repeatedly
Ulf Magnusson wrote:
While searching for an answer, I noticed that lots of people seem
to have had problems with cross-compilation that to me look more
like problems in the documentation, which I find a bit sad.
Rather than repeatedly complain, the most constructive
contribution would be to co
On 11/29/06, Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> How are you supposed to find the canonical name of a system (of known
> type) in CPU-Vendor-OS form in the general case? If you have access to
> a system of that particular type, you can run config.guess to find
> out, b
Ulf Magnusson wrote:
How are you supposed to find the canonical name of a system (of known
type) in CPU-Vendor-OS form in the general case? If you have access to
a system of that particular type, you can run config.guess to find
out, but you might not have, and that approach won't work for many
s
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 11:03:20PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> [ first, this is the wrong list to ask such question, gcc-help is the
> right one ]
I disagree in this case.
> On Nov 27, 2006, at 7:25 PM, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> >How are you supposed to find the canonical name of a system (of
> >
On 11/28/06, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ first, this is the wrong list to ask such question, gcc-help is the
right one ]
On Nov 27, 2006, at 7:25 PM, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> How are you supposed to find the canonical name of a system (of
> known type) in CPU-Vendor-OS form in the gene
[ first, this is the wrong list to ask such question, gcc-help is the
right one ]
On Nov 27, 2006, at 7:25 PM, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
How are you supposed to find the canonical name of a system (of
known type) in CPU-Vendor-OS form in the general case?
In the general case, you ask someone tha
How are you supposed to find the canonical name of a system (of known
type) in CPU-Vendor-OS form in the general case? If you have access to
a system of that particular type, you can run config.guess to find
out, but you might not have, and that approach won't work for many
systems anyway. The can
10 matches
Mail list logo
