> > We can now identify the exact version of gcc t have simply by the
> > revision number and branch name. So maintaining all this stuff in a
> > DATESTAMP, etc, is severe overkill when you could simply use the result
> > of "svnversion .' and commit that to a file, or do it client side).
>
> I th
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 23:59 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Daniel Berlin:
>
> >> Is it okay to make an unreviewed test commit?
>
> > Uh, commit all you want.
>
> Permissions don't seem to be set correctly:
>
> SendingChangeLog
> Sendinglibgcc2.h
> Transmitting file data ..svn:
* Daniel Berlin:
>> Is it okay to make an unreviewed test commit?
> Uh, commit all you want.
Permissions don't seem to be set correctly:
SendingChangeLog
Sendinglibgcc2.h
Transmitting file data ..svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: Can't create directory '/svn/gcc/db/trans
Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > CVS write access users should give the subversion setup a try this week.
>
> Is there a branch that represents the tip of the old-gcc repository? It
> appears that premerge-fsf-branch is intented to be
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 23:20 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Daniel Berlin:
>
> > CVS write access users should give the subversion setup a try this week.
> >
> > Directions on how to do common operations are at
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SvnHelp
> >
> > I have placed the repo in exactly the plac
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 22:19 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > CVS write access users should give the subversion setup a try this week.
>
> Is there a branch that represents the tip of the old-gcc repository?
No. old-gcc got merged into the current gc
Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> CVS write access users should give the subversion setup a try this week.
Is there a branch that represents the tip of the old-gcc repository? It
appears that premerge-fsf-branch is intented to be this, but it is missing
many files from old-gcc reposito
> Presumably, no longer tagging any snapshots, instead just reporting the
> revision number and branch name in the snapshot announcements?
Uh, tags are cheap, it can tag them if it likes. Who cares.
>
> > The other contrib scripts have been updated by Ben Elliston, and were
> > posted to gcc
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> Note that this is a pretty straightforward conversion, but the whole
> script is really overkill for the following reason:
>
> We can now identify the exact version of gcc t have simply by the
> revision number and branch name. So maintaining all this
CVS write access users should give the subversion setup a try this week.
Directions on how to do common operations are at
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SvnHelp
I have placed the repo in exactly the place on gcc.gnu.org it will end
up in during the final conversion, and in the exact condition (IE tags,
10 matches
Mail list logo
