2012/4/26 Peter A. Felvegi:
> On 04/23/2012 08:20 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> Please check it's not http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24926
>> first
>
> Hello,
>
> it seems to be the same issue, quite dated, though.
Yes, we have a number of long-standing bugs to do with
access-check
On 04/23/2012 08:20 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23 April 2012 18:48, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
"Peter A. Felvegi" writes:
Should I file a bug report?
Yes, please. Thanks.
Please check it's not http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24926 first
Hello,
it seems to be the same issue, q
On 23 April 2012 18:48, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> "Peter A. Felvegi" writes:
>
>> Should I file a bug report?
>
> Yes, please. Thanks.
Please check it's not http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24926 first
"Peter A. Felvegi" writes:
> Should I file a bug report?
Yes, please. Thanks.
Ian
Hello,
clang gave an error on a code that compiled with gcc so far. The reduced
test case is:
8<8<8<8<---
class V;
struct E
{
E(const V& v_);
char* c;
V* v;
int i;
};
class V
{
private:
union {
char* c;
struct {
V* v;
int i;
};
};
};
E::E(const V& v_) :
c(v_.c), // line 25
