On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 04:16:17PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Have you got a chance to take a look at the materials?
> If yes, what do you think on it?
Nope, sorry, too busy with other things.
OG.
Oliver.
Have you got a chance to take a look at the materials?
If yes, what do you think on it?
Yours sincerely,
George.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?:
Thank you for your reply, Oliver.
Briefly speaking the solution to the problems you have mentioned looks
like this:
1. take a loot at the first pi
Thank you for your reply, Oliver.
Briefly speaking the solution to the problems you have mentioned looks
like this:
1. take a loot at the first picture here:
http://docs.georgeshagov.com/twiki/tiki-index.php?page=Matrix+Linking+how+it+works
2. Pointer 1, 2... are vptrs
3. The idea is that each
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:49:03AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Changing the _vptr or C equivalent dynamically]
> I would like the community would have considered the idea. I am ready to
> answer all the questions you might have.
Changing the virtual function pointer dynamically using a seria
I appreciate your reply, Joe.
But I do not think this is off-topic, though. If we are going to discuss
the details of your project, Ptolomy, right, then it would have been
off-topic, I think. But I'm talking about GCC, therefore I believe this
is the right place to post these ideas.
What I am t
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 09:33:16AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is this a thread safe operation for your Ptolomy project?
> Should you suspend the application in order to load 'new classes' there?
I answered this off-list, because it's off-topic.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: FW: matrix linking
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 09:54:25PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have an invention which makes possible to brake through the barriers of
> common software development.
Nothing new here: add a level of indirection (or
Dear Sirs.
In respect of your time I will straight to the matter.
It is absolutely obvious that in today's world in order to be on the top it
is required to be innovative. Without that you can not brake through the
competitors. It is just impossible.
I have an invention which makes possible to
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 09:54:25PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have an invention which makes possible to brake through the barriers of
> common software development.
Nothing new here: add a level of indirection (or use C++ virtual
functions), and dynamically load code. In the Ptolemy proj
