So no one wastes time looking into this
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Matt Davis wrote:
> Hello,
> In my compiler pass, I am inserting a new gimple call statement, and
> then replacing the next call. This usually works fine, and after I do
> this, the gimple dump looks as I expect. Howe
Hello,
In my compiler pass, I am inserting a new gimple call statement, and
then replacing the next call. This usually works fine, and after I do
this, the gimple dump looks as I expect. However, in one case, I
trigger gcc to abort in "remove_unreachable_handlers, at
tree-eh.c:3524" this is for
