On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 10:42, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Well, one might be tempted to write that explicit memset to eliminate
> the conditional branch, except that it's technically required because
> data() might return nullptr. 8-/
Which is why you shouldn't write that code :-)
But this is a digre
* Jonathan Wakely:
> On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 10:06, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>
>> * Jonathan Wakely via Gcc:
>>
>> >> It seems it might even be trivial enough for me to investigate and
>> >> tackle myself, in some spare time.
>> >>
>> >> I see very little code using either of these features, so it's
On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 10:06, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Jonathan Wakely via Gcc:
>
> >> It seems it might even be trivial enough for me to investigate and
> >> tackle myself, in some spare time.
> >>
> >> I see very little code using either of these features, so it's
> >> definitely not a high pr
* Jonathan Wakely via Gcc:
>> It seems it might even be trivial enough for me to investigate and
>> tackle myself, in some spare time.
>>
>> I see very little code using either of these features, so it's
>> definitely not a high priority task regardless.
>>
>
> Glibc uses the nonnull attribute in
On Mon, 22 May 2023, 00:40 peter0x44 via Gcc, wrote:
>
> I would be happy to open a PR to improve this warning, if there isn't
> one already.
>
Please do.
>
> It seems it might even be trivial enough for me to investigate and
> tackle myself, in some spare time.
>
> I see very little code usin
Hi,
So, recently I learned about the c99 feature to get NULL pointer checks
for array function arguments.
I have really never seen this feature used in an actual codebase. It's
definitely something I wanted on a few occasions.
To be clear, I'm talking about specifically:
void foo(int array
