Hi,
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 15:15, Sandeep Soni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As part of GSoC 2010, I am developing a front end for GIMPLE.
> You can find the basic theme of the project at:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GimpleFrontEnd
>
> One of the most important components in this GIMPLE Front End is to
> conve
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Yup. This shade of blue can be changed later. Sandi, let's start
> with the S-expression syntax for everything. Richard is correct in
> pointing out that even gimple expressions have metadata associated
> with them that will need to be re
[ apologies for the duplicate message. My previous reply was bounced
by the ML. ]
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:52, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>> On 05/18/2010 04:05 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
>> > On 18/05/2010 15:17, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> >
>> >> IMHO, ideally we would have a syntax that is human rea
On 05/18/2010 04:05 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 18/05/2010 15:17, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>
>> IMHO, ideally we would have a syntax that is human readable and human
>> writable. S-expressions are not as easy to read for me as something
>> that resembles C.
>
> I'd like it that way too, but I ackno
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
wrote:
> BTW, is it possible today to have a GCC plugin providing a front-end to
> GCC? [last time I looked, I believe the answer is no]
This is one of the reasons for my patches to better hide the
middle-end details from the front ends.
Ciao
On 18/05/2010 15:17, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> IMHO, ideally we would have a syntax that is human readable and human
> writable. S-expressions are not as easy to read for me as something
> that resembles C.
I'd like it that way too, but I acknowledge that it would be more work and
it's not me wh
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 15:59 +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, 18 May 2010, Diego Novillo wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 16:15, Sandeep Soni
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > 1. What should be the format of representation
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 15:59 +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 18 May 2010, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 16:15, Sandeep Soni wrote:
> >
> > > 1. What should be the format of representation of the GIMPLE tuples in
> > >text?
> >
> > I liked Andrew's suggesti
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 09:59, Michael Matz wrote:
>
>> I don't see how that is much easier to parse compared to
>> i_1 = k_1 + m_1
>> j_1 = func (arg1, arg2)
>
> Well, it would make the parser almost trivial to implement. But you
> have
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 09:59, Michael Matz wrote:
> I don't see how that is much easier to parse compared to
> i_1 = k_1 + m_1
> j_1 = func (arg1, arg2)
Well, it would make the parser almost trivial to implement. But you
have a point, the only structurally complex objects we need to parse
ar
Hi,
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 16:15, Sandeep Soni wrote:
>
> > 1. What should be the format of representation of the GIMPLE tuples in
> >text?
>
> I liked Andrew's suggestion about S-expressions.
I can see that for describing types, maybe. But i
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 16:15, Sandeep Soni wrote:
> 1. What should be the format of representation of the GIMPLE tuples in text?
I liked Andrew's suggestion about S-expressions. It looks like a good
balance between ease of parsing/writing. We can always tweak the
format as we go.
As for poin
On 05/18/2010 04:24 AM, Sandeep Soni wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>>>For example:
>>>A textual GIMPLE tuple for the statement a=b+c can be like
>>>> (As demonstrated by the internal
>>> manual also).
>>>Is such a representation easy to parse?
>>
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> For example:
>> A textual GIMPLE tuple for the statement a=b+c can be like
>> > (As demonstrated by the internal
>> manual also).
>> Is such a representation easy to parse?
>
> S-expressions are easier to parse and more compact,
On 05/17/2010 09:15 PM, Sandeep Soni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As part of GSoC 2010, I am developing a front end for GIMPLE.
> You can find the basic theme of the project at:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GimpleFrontEnd
>
> One of the most important components in this GIMPLE Front End is to
> convert the GIMP
Hi,
As part of GSoC 2010, I am developing a front end for GIMPLE.
You can find the basic theme of the project at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GimpleFrontEnd
One of the most important components in this GIMPLE Front End is to
convert the GIMPLE tuples into text.
How such a textual representation shoul
16 matches
Mail list logo
