Hello,
I will be posting today some changes on the patches mailing list. I
believe that due to some changes in the way clones are materialized, the
transformation now supports IPA-SRA by default. I still need to test
this more thoroughly, but initial tests show that this is no longer an
issue
Hi Richard,
just some top-level comments before I write about anything specific:
* I have removed all non-essential flags I introduced
* I have placed the standard headers before config
* I have squashed some changes that I sent to the patches mailing list
and make sure that the transformation
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 5:21 PM Erick Ochoa
wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review Richard I'll address what I can. I also provide
> maybe some hindsight into some of the design decisions here. I'm not
> trying to be defensive just hoping to illuminate why some decisions were
> made and how some criticis
Thanks for the review Richard I'll address what I can. I also provide
maybe some hindsight into some of the design decisions here. I'm not
trying to be defensive just hoping to illuminate why some decisions were
made and how some criticisms may fail to really address the reason why
these design
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 6:44 PM Erick Ochoa
wrote:
>
> Hello again,
>
> I've been working on several implementations of data layout
> optimizations for GCC, and I am again kindly requesting for a review of
> the type escape based dead field elimination and field reorg.
>
> Thanks to everyone that
Hello again,
I've been working on several implementations of data layout
optimizations for GCC, and I am again kindly requesting for a review of
the type escape based dead field elimination and field reorg.
Thanks to everyone that has helped me. The main differences between the
previous comm
