Thanks for the context, all!
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:22 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 08:14:20AM +0100, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> > > Sorry, just going around in circles a bit, I guess this may be a better
> > > summary:
> > > If I had to pick a -g flag/semantic for
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 08:14:20AM +0100, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> > Sorry, just going around in circles a bit, I guess this may be a better
> > summary:
> > If I had to pick a -g flag/semantic for this, I guess I'd pick
> > -gdwarf32/64 without implied -g. I'd pick that if I knew GCC woul
ark Wielaard ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org <
> gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; ikud...@accesssoftek.com ;
> mask...@google.com
> *Subject:* Re: DWARF64 gcc/clang flag discussion
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:52 PM David Blaikie wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 5:10 PM Alexander Yermolovich
From: Richard Biener
Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 12:36 AM
To: David Blaikie
Cc: Alexander Yermolovich ; Jakub Jelinek ;
Mark Wielaard ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org ;
ikud...@accesssoftek.com ; mask...@google.com
Subject: Re: DWARF64 gcc/clang flag discussion
On Thu
To:* Alexander Yermolovich
>> *Cc:* Richard Biener ; Jakub Jelinek <
>> ja...@redhat.com>; Mark Wielaard ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org <
>> gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; ikud...@accesssoftek.com ;
>> mask...@google.com
>> *Subject:* Re: DWARF64 gcc/clan
ark Wielaard ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org <
> gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; ikud...@accesssoftek.com ;
> mask...@google.com
> *Subject:* Re: DWARF64 gcc/clang flag discussion
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 10:44 AM Alexander Yermolovich
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
From: David Blaikie
Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 1:12 PM
To: Alexander Yermolovich
Cc: Richard Biener ; Jakub Jelinek
; Mark Wielaard ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
; ikud...@accesssoftek.com ;
mask...@google.com
Subject: Re: DWARF64 gcc/clang flag discussion
On
ark Wielaard ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org <
> gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; ikud...@accesssoftek.com ;
> mask...@google.com
> *Subject:* Re: DWARF64 gcc/clang flag discussion
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 5:04 PM Alexander Yermolovich
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
From: David Blaikie
Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 10:33 AM
To: Alexander Yermolovich
Cc: Richard Biener ; Jakub Jelinek
; Mark Wielaard ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
; ikud...@accesssoftek.com ;
mask...@google.com
Subject: Re: DWARF64 gcc/clang flag discussion
On
ark Wielaard ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org <
> gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; ikud...@accesssoftek.com ;
> mask...@google.com
> *Subject:* Re: DWARF64 gcc/clang flag discussion
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:36 AM Alexander Yermolovich
> wrote:
>
> Thank you David for driving the conversation,
From: David Blaikie
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 12:09 PM
To: Alexander Yermolovich
Cc: Richard Biener ; Jakub Jelinek
; Mark Wielaard ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
; ikud...@accesssoftek.com ;
mask...@google.com
Subject: Re: DWARF64 gcc/clang flag discussion
On
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:35:36PM +, Alexander Yermolovich via Gcc wrote:
> I guess discussion is from perspective of having both flags
> gdwarf32/gdwarf64. In which case it's a valid question on whether
> they should imply -g like -gdwarf-#. But can this be viewed as only
> a -gdwarf64 flag,
ovember 25, 2020 1:46 PM
> *To:* Richard Biener
> *Cc:* Jakub Jelinek ; Mark Wielaard ;
> gcc@gcc.gnu.org ; ikud...@accesssoftek.com <
> ikud...@accesssoftek.com>; Alexander Yermolovich ;
> mask...@google.com
> *Subject:* Re: DWARF64 gcc/clang flag discussion
>
> On Wed, No
>
>
> From: David Blaikie
> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 1:46 PM
> To: Richard Biener
> Cc: Jakub Jelinek ; Mark Wielaard ;
> gcc@gcc.gnu.org ; ikud...@accesssoftek.com
> ; Alexander Yermolovich ;
> mask...@google.com
> Sub
; Alexander Yermolovich ;
mask...@google.com
Subject: Re: DWARF64 gcc/clang flag discussion
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:22 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 7:38 PM David Blaikie wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:11 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:22 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 7:38 PM David Blaikie wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:11 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:04:45PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2020-11-24 at
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 7:38 PM David Blaikie wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:11 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:04:45PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 08:50 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:45
> Sure enough - I was more getting at "would Clang's choice here have
> much/any influence on GCC's choice in the future"? (ie: Is GCC
> interested in compatibility with Clang?)
I'd say yes, but this criterion comes second after consistency with itself.
The latter dictates a -g switch so, once thi
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:11 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:04:45PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 08:50 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:45 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > I agree with Richard and I'd lean tow
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:45 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 06:38:16PM -0800, David Blaikie via Gcc wrote:
> > > I would pick -gdwarf32/-gdwarf64 (are we sure the DWARF spec will
> > > never reach version 32 or 64?
> > > maybe -g32 / -g64 similar to -m32/-m64 are good enough?
On 11/24/20 4:11 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:04:45PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 08:50 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:45 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I agree with Richard and I'd lean towards -gdwar
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:04:45PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 08:50 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:45 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > I agree with Richard and I'd lean towards -gdwarf32/-gdwarf64, even
> > > when DWARF 32 is released in 8
Hi,
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 08:50 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:45 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > I agree with Richard and I'd lean towards -gdwarf32/-gdwarf64, even
> > when DWARF 32 is released in 81 years from now or how many, it would
> > use -gdwarf-32.
>
> Works for m
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:45 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 06:38:16PM -0800, David Blaikie via Gcc wrote:
> > > I would pick -gdwarf32/-gdwarf64 (are we sure the DWARF spec will
> > > never reach version 32 or 64?
> > > maybe -g32 / -g64 similar to -m32/-m64 are good enough?)
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 06:38:16PM -0800, David Blaikie via Gcc wrote:
> > I would pick -gdwarf32/-gdwarf64 (are we sure the DWARF spec will
> > never reach version 32 or 64?
> > maybe -g32 / -g64 similar to -m32/-m64 are good enough?)
>
> Any sense of a good way to break the tie/uncertainty?
>
>
On 11/23/20 8:03 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 6:59 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/23/20 7:38 PM, David Blaikie via Gcc wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:32 AM Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 1:21 AM m...@klomp.org wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 6:59 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/23/20 7:38 PM, David Blaikie via Gcc wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:32 AM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 1:21 AM m...@klomp.org wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:22:26PM +, Alexander Yermolovic
On 11/23/20 7:38 PM, David Blaikie via Gcc wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:32 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 1:21 AM m...@klomp.org wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:22:26PM +, Alexander Yermolovich wrote:
On llvm side of compiler world there has been wo
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:32 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 1:21 AM m...@klomp.org wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:22:26PM +, Alexander Yermolovich wrote:
> > > On llvm side of compiler world there has been work done by Igor Kudrin to
> > > enable DWARF64.
>
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 1:21 AM m...@klomp.org wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:22:26PM +, Alexander Yermolovich wrote:
> > On llvm side of compiler world there has been work done by Igor Kudrin to
> > enable DWARF64.
> > I am trying to add a flag to Clang to enable DWARF64 generation.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:22:26PM +, Alexander Yermolovich wrote:
> On llvm side of compiler world there has been work done by Igor Kudrin to
> enable DWARF64.
> I am trying to add a flag to Clang to enable DWARF64 generation.
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D90507
> In review David Blaikie point
Hello
On llvm side of compiler world there has been work done by Igor Kudrin to
enable DWARF64.
I am trying to add a flag to Clang to enable DWARF64 generation.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90507
In review David Blaikie pointed out that there has been a discussion on what to
call this flag:
https:
32 matches
Mail list logo
