On 3 June 2014 14:46, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 3 June 2014 12:16, Yury Gribov wrote:
Is this 8G of RAM? If yes - I'd be curious to know which part of
libsanitizer needs so much memory.
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is what I have in gcc.log:
>>> ==12356==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate
On 3 June 2014 12:16, Yury Gribov wrote:
>>> Is this 8G of RAM? If yes - I'd be curious to know which part of
>>> libsanitizer needs so much memory.
>>
>>
>> Here is what I have in gcc.log:
>> ==12356==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate 0x21000
>> (8589938688) bytes at address ff00
On 06/03/2014 12:16 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
Is this 8G of RAM? If yes - I'd be curious to know which part of
libsanitizer needs so much memory.
Here is what I have in gcc.log:
==12356==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate 0x21000
(8589938688) bytes at address ff000 (errno: 12)^M
==
Is this 8G of RAM? If yes - I'd be curious to know which part of
libsanitizer needs so much memory.
Here is what I have in gcc.log:
==12356==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate 0x21000
(8589938688) bytes at address ff000 (errno: 12)^M
==12356==ReserveShadowMemoryRange failed while
On 3 June 2014 08:39, Yury Gribov wrote:
> Christophe,
>
>
>> Indeed, when testing on my laptop, execution tests fail because
>> libsanitizer wants to allocated 8GB of memory (I am using qemu as
>> execution engine).
>
> Is this 8G of RAM? If yes - I'd be curious to know which part of
> libsanitiz
Christophe,
> Indeed, when testing on my laptop, execution tests fail because
> libsanitizer wants to allocated 8GB of memory (I am using qemu as
> execution engine).
Is this 8G of RAM? If yes - I'd be curious to know which part of
libsanitizer needs so much memory.
-Y
Hi,
I am updating my (small) patch to enable libsanitizer on AArch64, but
I am wondering about the testing.
Indeed, when testing on my laptop, execution tests fail because
libsanitizer wants to allocated 8GB of memory (I am using qemu as
execution engine).
When running on servers with more RAM, t
