On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 09:13 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 14:59, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > It seems the only reason we have PHI_ARG_IMM_USE_NODE (and a struct
> > ssa_use_operand_d) in a phi node argument (struct phi_arg_d) is *just*
> > so we can iterate over the uses and han
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 14:59, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> It seems the only reason we have PHI_ARG_IMM_USE_NODE (and a struct
> ssa_use_operand_d) in a phi node argument (struct phi_arg_d) is *just*
> so we can iterate over the uses and hand back use_operand_p.
>
> I'm talking, in particular, about:
>
It seems the only reason we have PHI_ARG_IMM_USE_NODE (and a struct
ssa_use_operand_d) in a phi node argument (struct phi_arg_d) is *just*
so we can iterate over the uses and hand back use_operand_p.
I'm talking, in particular, about:
struct phi_arg_d GTY(())
{
/* imm_use MUST be the first el
