On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Peter A. Felvegi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello,
>
> i've found this in the known non-bugs list
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#known), after running into the issue. gcc
> 3.4-4.2 gives a compile error, but 4.3 compiles it. is this a
> regression, or the rule
hello,
i've found this in the known non-bugs list
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#known), after running into the issue. gcc
3.4-4.2 gives a compile error, but 4.3 compiles it. is this a
regression, or the rules were relaxed somewhat (c++0x?) ? i checked the
changelog, but couldn't find any relevant
