On 4/13/12, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 10:46 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > The table at http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html indicates
> > most of the concurrency work is not done, but I think the status
> > is better than it shows.
> >
> > If I'm not mistaken strong CAS a
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 10:46 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> The table at http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html indicates most of
> the concurrency work is not done, but I think the status is better
> than it shows.
>
> If I'm not mistaken strong CAS and bidirectional fences are done.
>
> Does an
The table at http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html indicates most of
the concurrency work is not done, but I think the status is better
than it shows.
If I'm not mistaken strong CAS and bidirectional fences are done.
Does anything need to be done for atomics in signal handlers?
at_quick_exit()
